The forecast paper for ECN 327 that is due next Thursday MUST include correctly formatted footnotes and bibliographies. You should get into the habit of doing this for every paper you write. In order to make this process a bit less daunting for you, I have located an easy-to-use link that illustrates the appropriate footnote and corresponding bibliographic entries for various types of sources you might reference. I have chosen the Chicago style for this.
Finally, all of you need to avoid using incorrect words that unfortunately have the effect of making your writing and/or you appear to be "dumb" to persons who don't know you. I am referring to the confusion between "effect" and "affect," and "to" versus "too." I have a handout for you detailing this. If you confuse these words in your papers, you will be penalized a +/- on your paper grade.
Finally, those papers are due at the beginning of class next Thursday. I have no intention of negotiating dates I will receive these. As stated in the syllabus, you can still hand in a paper after class Thursday until the beginning of our exam, but with a grade reduced by one letter grade.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Third Quarter 2010 GDP Revision
The revision to third quarter 2010 GDP was released last week. The original estimate, 2.0%, was revised up to 2.5%, a more "respectable" number than the original. In the first release of each quarter's GDP number, inventories, exports, and imports are all approximated. Subsequent months will use available data to eliminate the "educated guesses" contained in the first estimate. That was the case for today's release. Here is a story discussing the GDP release.
As the official GDP releases represent somewhat "stale" data, we can approximate what they will entail using real-time data from asset markets, which has been a central theme of my classes. To do this, go to StockCharts.com and on the middle right select the PerfChart (this stands for Performance Chart) that deals with the sectors of the S&P 500. To save you time and effort, here is the link.
PROCEDURE:
First, choose a bar chart at the bottom left (second button from the left). Then, move the slider (bottom right) to cover the exact time period you desire. Here, I have used the third quarter of 2010.
ANALYSIS:
Observe which sectors have performed better than the S&P 500 index (i.e., outperformed the overall market). This occurs when the S&P 500 button at the top left of the chart is selected.
For the third quarter of 2010, clearly the most cyclically sensitive sectors outperformed the market, with the exception of Financials. Overall, this is a reflection of the growth that occurred during that quarter. Had the defensive sectors (i.e., Consumer Staples, Health Care, and Utilities) outperformed, this would have signaled a potentially weakening economy.
Can this analysis be used to help predict the GDP report before it is actually released? The answer is yes. Asset markets, one of which is the stock market, are leading indicators, which means they tend to move in advance of changes in other parts of the economy. So, current changes in leading economic indicators tend to signal future changes we can expect to observe in the overall economy.
What is the stock market (and its sectors) telling us about the fourth quarter rate of economic growth? The second chart (click to enlarge) shows market performance since October 1. Other than Energy and Consumer Discretionary stocks (which themselves are cyclical), the remainder of cyclical indicators are performing less well than they did in the third quarter. The apparent message is that economic growth in the fourth quarter will be slower than it was in Q3, or spotty at best in comparison.
There are two things that should be noted. First, there is no indication that economic growth will become negative in Q4. Second, the slowing of economic growth these sectors seem to be indicting also affects the defensive sectors, so they are more negative than they were in Q3. The greater under performance utilities may also reflect an expectation of somewhat higher interest rates in the near term (i.e., (public) utilities like electric companies tend to pay high dividends which become less attractive when interest rates are expected to rise). Part of this no doubt reflects ongoing worries about the US housing market and the economic stability and solvency of several European countries as well (Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, sometimes referred to as the PIIGS, using their first letters). Will economic weakness in Europe weaken the recent momentum the US has been experiencing? The market apparently believe that this is likely.
Let me suggest that you continue to follow the sectors as we move farther into the fourth quarter and see what the market is suggesting. We won't get the initial Q4 GDP data until late in January, so this should be informative in advance of the formal data in January (that will be stale at that point).
As the official GDP releases represent somewhat "stale" data, we can approximate what they will entail using real-time data from asset markets, which has been a central theme of my classes. To do this, go to StockCharts.com and on the middle right select the PerfChart (this stands for Performance Chart) that deals with the sectors of the S&P 500. To save you time and effort, here is the link.
PROCEDURE:
First, choose a bar chart at the bottom left (second button from the left). Then, move the slider (bottom right) to cover the exact time period you desire. Here, I have used the third quarter of 2010.
ANALYSIS:
Observe which sectors have performed better than the S&P 500 index (i.e., outperformed the overall market). This occurs when the S&P 500 button at the top left of the chart is selected.
For the third quarter of 2010, clearly the most cyclically sensitive sectors outperformed the market, with the exception of Financials. Overall, this is a reflection of the growth that occurred during that quarter. Had the defensive sectors (i.e., Consumer Staples, Health Care, and Utilities) outperformed, this would have signaled a potentially weakening economy.
Can this analysis be used to help predict the GDP report before it is actually released? The answer is yes. Asset markets, one of which is the stock market, are leading indicators, which means they tend to move in advance of changes in other parts of the economy. So, current changes in leading economic indicators tend to signal future changes we can expect to observe in the overall economy.
What is the stock market (and its sectors) telling us about the fourth quarter rate of economic growth? The second chart (click to enlarge) shows market performance since October 1. Other than Energy and Consumer Discretionary stocks (which themselves are cyclical), the remainder of cyclical indicators are performing less well than they did in the third quarter. The apparent message is that economic growth in the fourth quarter will be slower than it was in Q3, or spotty at best in comparison.There are two things that should be noted. First, there is no indication that economic growth will become negative in Q4. Second, the slowing of economic growth these sectors seem to be indicting also affects the defensive sectors, so they are more negative than they were in Q3. The greater under performance utilities may also reflect an expectation of somewhat higher interest rates in the near term (i.e., (public) utilities like electric companies tend to pay high dividends which become less attractive when interest rates are expected to rise). Part of this no doubt reflects ongoing worries about the US housing market and the economic stability and solvency of several European countries as well (Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, sometimes referred to as the PIIGS, using their first letters). Will economic weakness in Europe weaken the recent momentum the US has been experiencing? The market apparently believe that this is likely.
Let me suggest that you continue to follow the sectors as we move farther into the fourth quarter and see what the market is suggesting. We won't get the initial Q4 GDP data until late in January, so this should be informative in advance of the formal data in January (that will be stale at that point).
Friday, November 19, 2010
The 50-Day Moving Average as Support
In the last post, I addressed how the Dow-Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) failed at resistance. In cases where the DJIA is expected to fall from that level, how far can it be expected to decline? To translate this into technical analysis terms, where is the next support level? In the most recent situation, that support was at the 50-day moving average. The chart below shows this (click to enlarge).
Notice how the market moved all the way down to the 50-day moving average then "bounced" off this newly found support level. As of the time this post is being written the Dow is moving once again toward the prior resistance level.
Had the market fallen below its support at the 50-day moving average, where would it likely have fallen? Again, where are the next support levels? We should view the 50-day moving average as support level #1 (S1). Below that, the next support (S2) occurs around 10,900, then 10,700 is S3 (both of these are derived from horizontal support lines. After S3 comes the 200-day moving average at 10,600. Note, though, that the DJIA moved above support here when it was not yet overbought (the RSI never fell below 30). So, it is quite possible that we will be testing resistance once again. As I have stated in earlier posts, to determine whether resistance is likely to hold, it is necessary to evaluate what would drive profit expectations to higher levels so that resistance would be broken? Again, check the economic calendar for the upcoming week or two.
Let me finish this post by showing another way to determine likely levels of support should the market fall in coming days. This is illustrated using Fibonacci Analysis. In StockCharts.com, when you choose "Annotation," there is an icon to do this. Go from the most recent low to the recent high. The result is illustrated below (click to enlarge).
To add Fibonacci Analysis, click on the button highlighted in the upper portion of the above chart, then drag your mouse from the low value to the high (hold the mouse button until you reach the final level).
According to Fibonacci Analysis, the first likely level of support from an uptrend "retraces" 38.2% of that uptrend (this is called a Fibonacci Retracement). If that level of support fails, the next likely support occurs at 50% retracement. Finally, the last support level is at 61.8% retracement. If the market falls below 61.8% retracement, it is fairly likely that the prior low will be tested. Consult the RSI to assist you in deciding (in real time) if this is likely to occur.
Notice how the market moved all the way down to the 50-day moving average then "bounced" off this newly found support level. As of the time this post is being written the Dow is moving once again toward the prior resistance level.
Had the market fallen below its support at the 50-day moving average, where would it likely have fallen? Again, where are the next support levels? We should view the 50-day moving average as support level #1 (S1). Below that, the next support (S2) occurs around 10,900, then 10,700 is S3 (both of these are derived from horizontal support lines. After S3 comes the 200-day moving average at 10,600. Note, though, that the DJIA moved above support here when it was not yet overbought (the RSI never fell below 30). So, it is quite possible that we will be testing resistance once again. As I have stated in earlier posts, to determine whether resistance is likely to hold, it is necessary to evaluate what would drive profit expectations to higher levels so that resistance would be broken? Again, check the economic calendar for the upcoming week or two.
Let me finish this post by showing another way to determine likely levels of support should the market fall in coming days. This is illustrated using Fibonacci Analysis. In StockCharts.com, when you choose "Annotation," there is an icon to do this. Go from the most recent low to the recent high. The result is illustrated below (click to enlarge).
To add Fibonacci Analysis, click on the button highlighted in the upper portion of the above chart, then drag your mouse from the low value to the high (hold the mouse button until you reach the final level).
According to Fibonacci Analysis, the first likely level of support from an uptrend "retraces" 38.2% of that uptrend (this is called a Fibonacci Retracement). If that level of support fails, the next likely support occurs at 50% retracement. Finally, the last support level is at 61.8% retracement. If the market falls below 61.8% retracement, it is fairly likely that the prior low will be tested. Consult the RSI to assist you in deciding (in real time) if this is likely to occur.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Dow Jones Fails at Resistance
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) recently tested then failed at resistance (of 11,258). There were signs in advance that this might happen. First, the index was very overbought, as the RSI (for nine periods) was far above the typical overbought reading of 70. Second, there was an intermarket relationship at work -- the US dollar found support. For quite some time now, the stock market and the US dollar have moved in opposite directions (the result of the dollar carry trade). The chart below (click to enlarge) shows this recent price action in the DJIA. The line below the DJIA chart is that of the US Dollar Index. Note how it turned up at support just as the DJIA failed at resistance.
Where will the market go from here? Translating this to technical analysis, where is the next support level? From the chart, the next support occurs at 11,100. The second (next) support level after that is at 10,900.
There is another element in this situation that needs to be examined, however. While the overall market has recently pulled back, does this mean the uptrend has now ended? The definition of an uptrend is not, as might sometimes be thought, continual increases in price. Instead, an uptrend is a series of higher highs and higher lows in price. At present, the DJIA is still in an uptrend. There is another way to help determine this. Using the RSI, an uptrend exists as long as RSI(9) > 40. While typically, a bullish signal is an RSI at or above 50, many persons (including myself) use support for a trend at the RSI of 40. In other words, as long as the RSI(9) remains at or above 40, view the uptrend in the DJIA will still be in tact.
So, will the uptrend remain in tact? Remember that in general, stock prices depend on interest rates and profit expectations. The primary driver at present is profit expectations. So, the question shifts to how profit expectations will behave in the near term. To answer this, it is necessary to consider monetary policy and QE2, whether US fiscal policy will shift to being contractionary, what other central banks are doing and will do, and how much strength other economies will be able to sustain. A critical factor in this is the strength of the Chinese economy. This is obviously related to whether China will further tighten its credit. A possible slowing of Chinese growth was behind today's (Friday) pullback.
To end this post, look at profits, the difference between revenues and costs. As the US dollar has been weakening, which has pushed commodity prices higher, this will raise production costs, working against future profits. What about revenues? If the economy begins to grow more rapidly and consumer spending continues to strengthen, then revenues may well continue to move in the right direction. But will this be enough to offset the effects of commodity-based cost increases? This is the question that everyone will be attempting to answer in the coming weeks.
There is another element in this situation that needs to be examined, however. While the overall market has recently pulled back, does this mean the uptrend has now ended? The definition of an uptrend is not, as might sometimes be thought, continual increases in price. Instead, an uptrend is a series of higher highs and higher lows in price. At present, the DJIA is still in an uptrend. There is another way to help determine this. Using the RSI, an uptrend exists as long as RSI(9) > 40. While typically, a bullish signal is an RSI at or above 50, many persons (including myself) use support for a trend at the RSI of 40. In other words, as long as the RSI(9) remains at or above 40, view the uptrend in the DJIA will still be in tact.
So, will the uptrend remain in tact? Remember that in general, stock prices depend on interest rates and profit expectations. The primary driver at present is profit expectations. So, the question shifts to how profit expectations will behave in the near term. To answer this, it is necessary to consider monetary policy and QE2, whether US fiscal policy will shift to being contractionary, what other central banks are doing and will do, and how much strength other economies will be able to sustain. A critical factor in this is the strength of the Chinese economy. This is obviously related to whether China will further tighten its credit. A possible slowing of Chinese growth was behind today's (Friday) pullback.
To end this post, look at profits, the difference between revenues and costs. As the US dollar has been weakening, which has pushed commodity prices higher, this will raise production costs, working against future profits. What about revenues? If the economy begins to grow more rapidly and consumer spending continues to strengthen, then revenues may well continue to move in the right direction. But will this be enough to offset the effects of commodity-based cost increases? This is the question that everyone will be attempting to answer in the coming weeks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)