Three Different Resistance Measures

The S&P 500 has stalled around its 50-day moving average, as was true the other day (see the previous post). Now that a few more days have passed since then, we saw a couple of spinning tops, which indicate indecision, then a large down day (yesterday) followed by a significant up day (today). Today's bullish candlestick was not as large as yesterday's bearish candle, and today the market opened from a higher level than yesterday's close. In OHLC charting, this is referred to as an inside day. Overall, I think it is safe to say that there is no definitive direction for future price change at this time. As I stated in class, at times like this, it is advisable to consult the economic calendar for the remainder of this week and next week, identify the "biggie" releases that will occur, then attempt to determine what each of these will do and how the market will react. Nobody can know this with certainty, so don't be intimidated. Actually, if you listen to the "talking heads" on the financial stations and keep track of what they predict, you'll probably be surprised by how inaccurate these persons are. So, don't be afraid to venture out and try this, you probably won't do any worse than the "talking heads."

Look at the following charts and analyze the most recent candlesticks and think about what they indicate about the battle between bulls and bears. Using these, I will now present three different ways to measure resistance.

#1: Fibonacci Retracement: If we apply a Fibonacci Retracement to the most recent high and low of the daily S&P 500 (see chart, click to enlarge), we see something quite interesting: the recent rally stalled at the 61.8% retracement point. The use of Fibonacci Retracement suggests that after a decline, the first possible point of resistance in a rally is when 38.2% of that rally has been erased (retraced). The next possible resistance point is at 50%, while the last occurs at 61.8% retracement.

#2: 50-day Moving Average: The next charts (click to enlarge) shows that the 50-day moving average acted as support for the S&P 500 since last fall, then became resistance in late January of this year. It is fairly common for prior support to become resistance (and vice versa). Note how the most recent rally failed just at the 50-day moving average. At this point, based on the most recent candlesticks, the direction of future price is still a toss up. A definitive move above the 50-day moving average, especially for a major market index, would be very bullish, and we might have a shot at returning to the previous high. If that were to occur, then the market falls below that level, what technical formation do we have? A double top, which is a reversal pattern. More about establishing a down target later this semester if this possibility occurs.

#3: RSI(9) < 60. In this same chart, look at the RSI in the upper portion. Note how the most recent high coincided with the RSI falling below 60 and remaining there. Just as the S&P is now testing its 50-day moving average, so too is it testing the RSI at 60.Often, an RSI value of 60 is used as resistance for a downtrend, while 40 is used to designate support for an uptrend.

So, what will happen from here? As I stated above, look at the economic calendar, identify the "biggie" numbers that can potentially move the market, and attempt to predict what each of these will do. In doing this, you are actually using economic theory, which states (for our purposes at this point):

      Stock Prices = f(interest rates, expected future profit)

In analyzing the future releases, focus primarily on the macroeconomic implications for profit expectations, since Fed Chair Bernanke indicated again today that the fed funds rate will remain low "for the foreseeable future." That reassurance was a fundamental driver of today's rally which erased most of yesterday's losses.

Surprise Discount Rate Announcment

Yesterday, after the markets closed, the Fed announced that it was raising the discount rate by 25 bp. Here is a story about this. The initial reaction after hours was as expected -- the announcement took everyone by surprise. Before this morning's market open, futures pointed to a down day, although the amount kept shrinking. What all of this points to is uncertainty and indecision as market participants digested all of this and formulated their views of the likely consequences.

Which types of candlestick bars depict this? Forget a candle with a long real body and little in terms of shadows (i.e., tails). Look over the candlesticks I covered the other day in class. One would expect either a doji or a spinning top. What actually occurred for the S&P 500 was a spinning top. Here is a chart of the current data (click to enlarge) as of the Friday close.

The RSI is not yet overbought, so potentially there is room for further upward price movement. Note that the RSI is approximately 60, which is the value that some use to indicate resistance for a time of weak price movement. The most striking thing in this chart is the fact that the $SPX closed above its 50-day MA for the first time since January of this  year. If the market were worried about the impact of the Fed raising the discount rate, would the S&P have closed above its 50-day MA today? No, it would not have. So, today's price action, in spite of signaling indecision in terms of a spinning top, does allow for the possibility that it the S&P will remain above its 50-day MA at least for the very near term. The real question is whether former resistance, in terms of the 50-day MA, will now become support.

How can we arrive at a way to answer this question? Using economic theory, we model stock prices. According to economic theory:

                    Stock Price = f(interest rates, expected profits)

Interest rates pertain to asset substitution possibilities in the short-term (review the stock and bond info in the Supply and Demand notes) and product demand in the medium term. Were yesterday's surprise discount rate announcement taken to indicate that Fed tightening was about to begin, not only would the market have failed to clear the 50-day MA today, there would likely have been a noticeable upper shadow (tail) as well. Also, there was a CPI data report today that signaled benign inflation, which signals that interest rates should not rise much.  So, the primary factor to focus on is profit expectations. For extra credit, due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, plot the relative strength of the S&P 500 (a measure of stocks) compared to TLT, a measure of longer-term bond prices using as a chart type a solid line with weekly data. In a short word document, include the chart with annotations from StockCharts.com (not hand written) and a very short discussion of what the relative strength of stocks vs bonds is showing us about expectations for future economic activity (and therefore profits). Feel free to consult John Murphy's text about this.

When you get a chance, you should read two excellent columns on technical analysis by Michael Kahn in Barron's Online. I strongly suggest that you save these and others throughout this semester (and beyond). The first of these, written in early February, talks about the market correction. Follow his reading of candlestick charts and overall analysis. The second, from this past week, analyzes the question of whether the market will be fighting back and trend up.

January Employment Report

 Friday's employment report was multifaceted, to say the least. First, there were the employment change results: -20,000 (a very small amount for the entire country, and not statistically significant). Then there were the employment revisions for 2009 -- very large, making the job loss during "The Great Recession" equal to 8.4 million. Finally, there was the unemployment rate, which fell from 10 percent to 9.7 percent. Recommendation: ALWAYS LOOK AT REVISIONS TO PRIOR PERIOD(S) BEFORE EXAMINING THE NEW DATA (as this establishes a proper context for you).

Much was written about these results. Here's what the WSJ said. Here is the link for a video from CNBC after the results were announced, and another link for the same group discussing things before the release. After reviewing all of these,make sure you understand: (1) that there are two separate surveys used for these results; (2) how can the unemployment rate actually fall if employment falls; and (3) what are the implications of the set of results for the stock market, bond market (interest rates), and the US dollar. As I have said numerous times already this semester, "other things" are seldom "equal." So, as a backdrop to all of this information from Europe, is the ongoing concern about the Sovereign debt of Spain, Ireland, and Portugal (these countries have now come to be referred to as the "PIG" countries). So, the final outcome of the day was the joint effect of the Sovereign debt problems and the US employment/unemployment rate data.

GDP Surprise

Friday's GDP report, the preliminary look at Q4 economic performance, was surprising. The consensus was for about a 4 percent gain, but the number came in at 5.7 percent. This was an excellent example of how "good news" impacts interest rates: good news tends to cause higher interest rates, as we discussed in class the other day. Here is the link for an article discussing this.

Initially the stock market and interest rates rose as the results were released. By the end of the day, however, things had changed.  The chart (click to enlarge), which uses 60-minute OHLC bars, shows how the ten-year US Government bond reacted throughout Friday's trading. First thing to note, the actual interest rate is 1/10 of the value listed on the right scale. So, for example, 36 corresponds to 3.6, etc. Second, note how closing values exceeded opening values for the first two bars (hours). How could we figure that momentum might begin to shift? Look for upper tails, where the bulls were unable to support high levels, and by the end of the time period, bears had pushed values lower. After the second bar (hour), things turned around for the rest of the day, as close was below open each hour. By the last hour, there was essentially a "toss up," as open and close were almost identical.

Why did rates reverse on the "good news." Much of the overall GDP growth was the result of inventory effects (3.7% of the 5.7%), which will not persist in coming quarters.So, while this GDP number was a surprise and good news, interest rates, like asset markets in general, are forward looking. So the news in coming quarters might not necessarily be all that much better than what the markets had been anticipating prior to the GDP release. More data, primarily for this actual quarter, will be needed to move the direction of interest rates from where they were that day. Support, though, appears to be at 3.6 percent. Will this level hold? As the course progresses , I will show you how to use economic models to make an educated guess at questions like this.