After "The" Employment Report

As you know from class, the September employment change was essentially in line with expectations. Payroll employment for the prior two months (July and August) was also revised significantly higher. Most notably, the original employment change for August, a 4,000 decline, was erased. The revised August employment number is an increase of 89,000. Along with this, the unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.7%, and average hourly earnings rose by a greater-than-expected 0.4%.

Hopefully, you took the time to perform the practice exercise in advance of this report. The markets viewed this as a strong employment report. The perceived (key word!) likelihood of a recession dropped noticeably as the result of today's data.

- The stock market liked the report a great deal. It was not too high as to preclude further Fed rate cuts, but not so low that it might have indicated we were in the early stages of a recession. Read a story about this.
- The bond market didn't like this at all -- both significant employment gains and the "hotter" than expected wage gain raised the inflation flag. Here is a story about this. Examine the yield curve to see how the bond market ultimately reacted. Clearly, the yield curve got steeper, indicating the expectation of stronger upcoming growth and inflation.
- The oddity today was the foreign exchange market. Normally, we would assume that the greater perceived economic growth and higher interest rates would both strengthen the US Dollar. However, by day's end, the dollar had weakened further. Read about this. It might have been profit taking by currency traders and the overall perception that the direction for the US dollar is still down. Where is the bounce (support)?

Following what I did in yesterday's posting, I revisited the Market Carpet at StockCharts.com. This time, I looked at the most recent 10 days (not the entire time since the Fed rate cut). The "carpet" below is what pertains (click to enlarge):
Now look at the sectors that have performed the best over the period of this carpet, the last 10 days. All (no exceptions) are cyclically sensitive sectors (look at the bottom right). The leader is Financials. This sector had taken a beating after the financial worries in August. But, with recent data showing that the commercial paper market is improving and possibly stabilizing, there was some "make-up" momentum. Generally, however, it is desirable to see both the Financial and Consumer Discretionary sectors outperforming other sectors.
So, over the past 10 days, the equity market has signaled expectations for an improving level of economic activity. None of these sectors would have performed so well had there been substantial recession concerns. For extra credit (due at the beginning of class on Wednesday), replicate this market carpet (look at yesterday's post for how to do this) but for the 14 days since the last rate cut. Print out the carpet and bring it to class.

Finally, look at the sectors that underperformed: Utilities; Health Care; and Consumer Staples. All of these are defensive sectors, that outperform when recession worries accelerate, but underperform when recession fears abate, as has been the case recently.

Gauging Consumer Spending At Present

As gasoline prices have been (generally) rising, we can use generalizations from microeconomic theory to create some macroeconomic predictions.

In the short-term, the demand for gasoline tends to be price inelastic (see: http://www.uri.edu/artsci/ecn/lardaro/lectures/Elasticity_of_Demand.pdf ). As a result, when gas price rises, total spending on gasoline tends to increase (other things being equal). Given income in the short-term, this means more of total income will be devoted to gasoline and less will be available for other purposes (of course the level of income must be considered as well). As a result, income available for discretionary purchases can be expected to fall, lowering discretionary spending.

This microeconomic effect has the potential to slow the rate of economic growth, causing a decrease in discretionary spending and a rise in non-discretionary spending. NOTE: this is a TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS, not a statistical certainty. Also, the magnitude of the change in not necessarily large. We can gauge the actual impact by examining two ETF': Consumer Staples (XLP) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY). More about these in the next few postings.