Bearish Divergence As A Leading Indicator of Price Change

Cyclical stocks ($CYC) move in the same direction as actual or expected economic growth. As a market, this is itself a leading indicator. And, its changes contain real-time information on market expectations concerning growth.

As you know, yesterday (9/21), two indicators were released that caused markets to change sentiment -- reflecting the belief that the economy would weaken farther and possibly faster than was previously expected. On yesterday's blog post, I detailed how this affected the 10-year bond rate. That rate fell again today (to 4.6%). With the expectation of slower growth, cyclicals should also weaken. And they did.

In the handouts on technical analysis, I detailed what is called a bearish divergence: price action moving higher but the RSI not experiencing higher highs. This is a leading indicator of a downward move in price in the near term. Note this is not 100% accurate, but it has a fairly good track record.

I have included a graph of cyclical stocks where such a bearish divergence is evident (and marked). Click on the chart to enlarge it.


Based on this bearish divergence, one should have expected some decline in cyclicals, and thus the perception of a weakening economy gaining traction. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THE ACTUAL ECONOMY WILL NECESSARILY WEAKEN -- JUST THAT THE EXPECTATION OF THE MARKET IS THAT IT WILL WEAKEN.

To earn extra credit, get the chart of cyclicals and using weekly data for the past two years, annotate the chart, drawing lines and adding comments. Determine if a bearish divergence occurred. Also, draw the support line for weekly data and a possible support line for the Relative Strength indicator. This will be accepted no later than the beginning of class on Monday. No pencil or pen lines will count.

The next test is to see if the support line (indicated in the graph) is broken next week. Note that cyclicals have been underperforming the overall market (based on a declining Relative Strength (below the graph) since early May. It is also possible to draw a support line for the Relative Strength indicator.

Soft Landing?

The economic indicators released today raised serious questions about how rapidly the overall economy is slowing. Prior to today, the consensus view was that economic growth would continue to slow, but not by enough to seriously crimp profits. Along with this, the Fed would be done raising rates, and might even begin rate cuts by the middle of 2007.

Two reports in particular, the Philadelphia Fed's Economic Activity Index was a negative value, well below the concensus (of around 13). Also, the Conference Board's Index of Leading Economic Indicators fell for the fourth time in the last five months. Hardly an endorsement for future economic strength. Read about these developments in an article.


















This percieved future loss of economic strength affected interest rates. The benchmark 10-year government bond fell by 8 basis points. Furthermore, by the end of the day, this rate had fallen to its support level from mid March. I have provided a chart using StockCharts.com (click on the graph to enlarge it). Note that at its present level, the 10-year is only slightly overbought and that short-term resistance is not the 200-day moving average. (NOTE: divide the right-side scale by 10 with this interest rate)