Surprise Discount Rate Announcment

Yesterday, after the markets closed, the Fed announced that it was raising the discount rate by 25 bp. Here is a story about this. The initial reaction after hours was as expected -- the announcement took everyone by surprise. Before this morning's market open, futures pointed to a down day, although the amount kept shrinking. What all of this points to is uncertainty and indecision as market participants digested all of this and formulated their views of the likely consequences.

Which types of candlestick bars depict this? Forget a candle with a long real body and little in terms of shadows (i.e., tails). Look over the candlesticks I covered the other day in class. One would expect either a doji or a spinning top. What actually occurred for the S&P 500 was a spinning top. Here is a chart of the current data (click to enlarge) as of the Friday close.

The RSI is not yet overbought, so potentially there is room for further upward price movement. Note that the RSI is approximately 60, which is the value that some use to indicate resistance for a time of weak price movement. The most striking thing in this chart is the fact that the $SPX closed above its 50-day MA for the first time since January of this  year. If the market were worried about the impact of the Fed raising the discount rate, would the S&P have closed above its 50-day MA today? No, it would not have. So, today's price action, in spite of signaling indecision in terms of a spinning top, does allow for the possibility that it the S&P will remain above its 50-day MA at least for the very near term. The real question is whether former resistance, in terms of the 50-day MA, will now become support.

How can we arrive at a way to answer this question? Using economic theory, we model stock prices. According to economic theory:

                    Stock Price = f(interest rates, expected profits)

Interest rates pertain to asset substitution possibilities in the short-term (review the stock and bond info in the Supply and Demand notes) and product demand in the medium term. Were yesterday's surprise discount rate announcement taken to indicate that Fed tightening was about to begin, not only would the market have failed to clear the 50-day MA today, there would likely have been a noticeable upper shadow (tail) as well. Also, there was a CPI data report today that signaled benign inflation, which signals that interest rates should not rise much.  So, the primary factor to focus on is profit expectations. For extra credit, due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, plot the relative strength of the S&P 500 (a measure of stocks) compared to TLT, a measure of longer-term bond prices using as a chart type a solid line with weekly data. In a short word document, include the chart with annotations from StockCharts.com (not hand written) and a very short discussion of what the relative strength of stocks vs bonds is showing us about expectations for future economic activity (and therefore profits). Feel free to consult John Murphy's text about this.

When you get a chance, you should read two excellent columns on technical analysis by Michael Kahn in Barron's Online. I strongly suggest that you save these and others throughout this semester (and beyond). The first of these, written in early February, talks about the market correction. Follow his reading of candlestick charts and overall analysis. The second, from this past week, analyzes the question of whether the market will be fighting back and trend up.

Fed Decision?

As expected, at 2:15 today the Federal Reserve made its decision not to raise rates (thank God!), and released its short statement summarizing its assessment of the economy now and in the future. Here is a copy of the actual Fed statement. And, as I indicated to you in class, the media provided an anal and microscopic evaluation of this statement compared to the previous one (click here).

How did the stock market react? Below is an image of the S&P 500 using 15-minute intervals (click to enlarge). Look this over, as a number of the key elements for reading market momentum show up. First, note when the announcement occurred at 2:15. The initial reaction was very positive (large up bar). But, that wasn't sustainable, as the RSI(9) showed an overbought reading (above 70). The next 15 minutes, we see a classic illustration of what happens when momentum diminishes -- a bar with a significant upper tail. This indicates that the bulls were able to push price fairly high, but the bears ultimately beat them back. For that bar, note the close (of the 15 minutes) was almost identical to the open. In the next bar, the open was above the prior bar's close, but things got bad for the bulls as the bears were clearly in control at this point. Take a look at the last bar of the trading day - a large range, the bears were clearly in control by then, and the close was almost at the low for that 15-minute period.


The day ended with an ugly price bar, but a glimmer of hope for tomorrow -- the RSI was giving an oversold reading (was below 30). If price should continue to fall, how low can we expect it to fall? Let me restate this: where is the next level of support? To find this, use the rule from class: look to the left. In other words, extend the time period of the chart. In the second graph (click to enlarge), I have extended to 5 days. From this, we are able to see the next level of support at around 1058.

Let's see what happens tomorrow.

Employment Report Effects

The February employment report was released yesterday at 8:30 am. The stakes for the markets were high: too low a number and recession fears would re-emerge, which would hurt the stock market but help the bond market; too high, and the opposite would be a problem, with a reduced likelihood of the Fed easing in the near term.

The payroll employment number that emerged was +97,000, which was high enough to remove recession fears, but not so high that worries of overheating would emerge. This scenario has come to be called the Goldilocks Scenario. Read the following article about all of this. Also, read the chapter on the employment report in the Carnes and Slifer text (The Atlas of Economic Indicators).

The stock market began the day with a healthy rise but gave much of this back by the end of the trading day. This often happens when markets get what they were hoping for (this is a variant of the old saying: Buy on the rumor, sell on the news). So, SUPPORT AND RESISTANCE BOTH HELD.

The principle items that caused a reaction in the bond market were a higher-than-expected rise in average hourly wages and a decline in the unemployment rate to 4.5%. In addition to these, the prior months' employment numbers were adjusted upward (this has been occurring for a while now). So, it is very likely that today's somewhat tepid payroll employment increase will be revised higher with the release of next month's data. All of these factors heightened inflation fears, causing a bond market sell off. The 10-year bond rate rose to just under 4.6%, an increase of 8 basis points for the day. Clearly, the bond market wants the Fed to lower interest rates, and the employment report dashed those hopes (for now at least). I guess the bond market's view of the world should be referred to as "The Three Bears," given the stock market's view.

So the "wildcard" for now is the mortgage market. How far will weakness in the sub-prime market reach higher tiers? It has already impacted the "Alt A" market, and with the tightening of lending standards, it will very likely creep somewhat into the market for prime mortgages. The different perceptions of the future state of the economy held by the stock and bond market centers largely on the answer to this question. For now, at least, it appears safe to say that "all's quiet on the carry trade front." Stay tuned.

An interesting article for you to read is by Jeremy Siegel. He attributes part of the recent volatility in stock markets to "trend following" by technicians. These traders (myself included) often place automated "stop loss" orders below the trend so they can insulate themselves from potentially large losses. Here's how a stop loss order works. You choose a price level at or below which you want to get out of a stock (or index like an ETF). Hopefully your choice is based on where support is. You should place the "stop" a bit below support, so that if a false breakdown occurs you don't get "stopped out," after which the stock begins to rise again. You then place an order stating this with your brokerage account. To automate this, specify the time frame for your order as "Good Till Cancelled," or GTC. Normally, this will remain in effect for several months. If, instead, you specify market day, you are only covered for that trading day, after which the order no longer exists. Specifying GTC thus automates this process so you don't have to remain in front of your computer all the time.

So when trendlines are finally broken in sustained uptrends, many of these stop orders kick in, potentially causing large sell offs, and magnified price declines. Hence the volatility aspects. I doubt that stop loss orders played the major role in the large Tuesday sell off, but they were certainly part of it.

A recommendation when you buy stocks: USE STOP LOSSES, but leave room below support in case a false breakdown occurs. Remember, capital preservation should be a primary factor for you.

How Strong are Retail Sales

Retail sales data were released today. At first glance, the number seemed disappointing -- retail sales fell by 0.4% (read article). There is, however, a quirk you need to know about when analyzing this number: it is a nominal value. Why is that a problem? Gasoline prices fell dramatically in September, giving the impression of retail weakness, when in reality that was not the case. To see this, recall that:

nominal retail sales = price x quantity

When a critical price falls dramatically, as that of gasoline did, we have a large drop in the price term, which tends to make the growth rate in retail sales low or negative, as was the case this month. Similarly, in months where gasoline prices rise, this will tend to push up the value of nominal retail sales.

So, at the present time, or any time when gasoline prices change substantially, gauge retail sales strength by focusing on retail sales excluding gasoline (and retail sales at service stations). For September, retail sales excluding sales at service stations rose by a respectable 0.6%. What a different perspective this gives!!

An important part of macroeconomics is knowing how to "read the tea leaves." The Carnes and Slifer book is very good for this (you should read the material dealing with retail sales). This is one more example of why it is important not to examine only overall indicator values without delving into greater detail.

Now, as the more meaningful real trend of retail sales indicates economic strength, the bond market sold off again today, pushing the 10-year bond rate all the way up to 4.8%. Read this story to see the details. It's safe to say that the bond market has dramatically changed its perspective from just one week ago. The likelihood of a Fed rate cut early in 2007 is somewhere between slim and none. Don't forget that the Fed Chair and several members also need to establish their "cred." Erring on the side of ease would be a major error they would suffer from for years to come. So, for them, it is preferable to err on the side of causing weakness than to risk higher inflation.

Dow Jones Record

The Dow-Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) set a new record today, closing at its highest level ever. You can read about today's performance or explore its history. The real question is whether this upward move has "legs." Will resistance hold, and today be part of a failed breakout, or will we move toward even higher levels?

Applying technical analysis, there is reason to think that today's record will be met with a pullback in the near term, even though the RSI doesn't indicate that $INDU is oversold (based on the weekly data used). The chart below (click to enlarge) illustrates that the record -- as resistance from early 2000 -- was broken today. Why do I think some pullback is coming? Using the RSI, there is a bearish divergence: the $INDU has moved higher (it has higher highs) but this has not been confirmed by the RSI (it has lower highs).

Where will the Dow-Jones go from here? To answer that question, economics is needed (see the prior post for an example of this).

stock prices = f(expected profit, interest rates)

Put these together and you get the present discounted value of expected future profits. Here are the types of questions that must be answered to arrive at an answer (which, bye the way, is a forecast):

(1) Has the Fed finished raising interest rates?
Will they actually lower rates next year (as the bond market presumes), or will inflation remain in the problematic range?
(2) Today, oil prices fell below $59/barrel. Will this continue? If so, this will moderate inflationary expectations and the inflation premium in nominal interest rates). What about declining gasoline prices? This will help consumers, but with a lag (it takes time to replenish the spending power lost over all these months with $3+ gasoline prices.
(3) How much damage to economic growth will be done by housing sector weakness? Have declining interest rates placed a bottom on the decline in housing, or is there quite a ways (down) to go yet? Look at a few home builder stocks. These appear to have bottomed. Is that a leading indicator of what is to come for the housing sector? Business construction (in the GDP accounts) have begun to rise. Will this be able to offset home construction weakness?
(4) Consumer debt has piled up -- largely through the use of home equity. What will power spending in the next several quarters if home equity can't? Job growth and income gains are critical here.
(5) Will business spending (Equipment and Software) be able to pick up the slack from weaker growth (or actual declines) in consumer spending? Judging from the most recent quarter's GDP report, no. But was the decline in this category an anomaly?
(6) Will growth in Europe continue to pick up and that of Asia remain strong? If so, this bodes well for export growth and profits to firms that have international sales.

This is not necessarily the entire list. But for a forecast of stock prices, like any forecast, you must identify what the relevant factors will be in the next 6 months or year, predict what each of these will do, then put all of this together to arrive at a conclusion.

Technical Analysis Applied to a Stock Pick

Today, Barron's Online had an article (subscribers only) with a strong recommendation to purchase Texas Instrucments (TXN), the maker of computer chips for computers and cell phones. While I have no doubt that just this recommendation led many to run out and purchase TXN, persons who know the tools we are using in class would have held off. Clearly, the "fundamentals" of TXN are very good, so the stock passes and important test. But should one buy it when a recommendation occurs? For persons who don't believe in technical anaylsis, the answer is a resounding "yes." They would likely point out that as a long-term investor, if the stock should fall in the near-term, it will surely rise later based on its strong fundamentals. Let's look at an annotated chart of TXN (click on it to get an enlarged version).

The first thing to determine is how close TXN is to resistance. It is apparent that resistance is at 34 (from April). It failed a breakout above 34 in late April and early May. That resistance recently held as well. Note from the Relative Strength graph (bottom) that TXN has failed to outperform the overall stock market since mid-August. So purchasing this stock now is a wonderful illlustration of my handouts in class -- how persons often tend to buy when a stock is close to resistance (i.e., price is high).

Why not wait until (or if) TXN clears resistance, then purchase it, or better yet, purchase at support? That is what I would recommend. Consider the "fundamental" investor. Should TXN drop to $30 from $34, assuming they purchased it at $34, they would need to recoup a 13.3% loss just to break even (=$4/$30). What they won't do, and that I recommended that you would do, is to consider purchasing at support -- this is the equivalent of "buying low."

The motto of the story: I often see buy recommendations for stocks given at a time when the technicals of those stocks are not "right." Use technical analysis with stop loss orders to manage gains and losses, and don't just "resign yourself to fate" in terms of whatever the stock price does, as the fundamental investors do.

Enter economic analysis: Is it likely that TXN will test resistance or fall to support? (As practice for you: Where do you see support here? Where would you think of buying this stock?) Since stock price is largely determined by expected profits (and interest rates), what is likely to be true of future profits for chip makers? Will electronics and computer purchases slow down as the year ends or will this get stronger? THIS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK. What a coincidence, that's what ECN 327 is all about!!! The products TXN's chips go into are part of discretionary spending, which is highly cyclical. So, if the bond market is correct, that a sharp slowdown is coming, prospects for TXN's stock price are not very bright, in spite of its present fundamental strength. If the stock market is correct, that we are headed for a "soft landing," then the prospects for TXN are brighter, and this might be a stock to keep track of. So, look at the graphs of cyclical stocks ($CYC) and discretionary goods (XLY). What is the real-time information from these graphs telling us? Is the Fed done raising interest rates? Will housing's fall not be sharp (due to falling 10-year bond rates, etc.)? These are the questions to consider.

Soft Landing?

The economic indicators released today raised serious questions about how rapidly the overall economy is slowing. Prior to today, the consensus view was that economic growth would continue to slow, but not by enough to seriously crimp profits. Along with this, the Fed would be done raising rates, and might even begin rate cuts by the middle of 2007.

Two reports in particular, the Philadelphia Fed's Economic Activity Index was a negative value, well below the concensus (of around 13). Also, the Conference Board's Index of Leading Economic Indicators fell for the fourth time in the last five months. Hardly an endorsement for future economic strength. Read about these developments in an article.


















This percieved future loss of economic strength affected interest rates. The benchmark 10-year government bond fell by 8 basis points. Furthermore, by the end of the day, this rate had fallen to its support level from mid March. I have provided a chart using StockCharts.com (click on the graph to enlarge it). Note that at its present level, the 10-year is only slightly overbought and that short-term resistance is not the 200-day moving average. (NOTE: divide the right-side scale by 10 with this interest rate)

Fed Rate Hike

Just as the Fed raised the federal funds rate by another 25 basis points Tuesday (3/22), to 2.75 percent, the stock and bond markets adjusted abruptly. Clearly, the change in wording indicated of the Fed's statement (http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/monetary/2005/20050322/ ) showed a greater concern about inflation (something we had already noted in class). The following day (today), the CPI release showed higher inflation than what was expected. This time, however, the stock and bond markets did not react as they did the previous day. The Dow-Jones average closed around 10,450, the Euro closed at $1.30, down from $1.34 just a few days ago, and the 10-year bond rate was almost unchanged from yesterday (at 4.61%).

For those familiar with candlestick charting, today's market activity formed a "shooting star," which occurred at a resistance level, when the RSI was in overbought territory. From a technical perspective, this set of occurrences points to the likelihood that the 10-year rate may be resting at its current level in the short-term.

Only a few days ago, the Dow-Jones tested resistance at 11,000. That seems like a long time ago, even though it was a short-time ago.

Finally, oil prices dropped sharply again today. Had this not occurred, would the decline in the Dow-Jones been as small?