Employment Report -- March

Yesterday the March employment report was released. To the surprise of many (including me), payroll employment rose by 180,000 over the February total. This was far above the consensus estimate of around 130,000. Ironically, there was no effect whatsoever upon the stock market. Of course, that's because the markets were closed the day the report was released. So, Monday should start off with a bang, as traders have had the entire weekend to think about their reaction to the report.

Part of the reason for a larger-than-expected employment gain was that when the February survey was undertaken there was a snow storm, which prevented some persons from getting to work during that week. THE EMPLOYMENT SURVEY IS CONDUCTED DURING THE WEEK THAT INCLUDES THE 12TH OF EACH MONTH. So, comparing to a month with snow storms leads to some distortions. February likely understated employment, and March, comparing to February, overstated employment strength. While the employment data are seasonally adjusted (a statistical smoothing that takes into account events that happen "normally" at the same point each year), atypical events -- like February's snow storm, often cause seasonal adjustment distortions. A very readable article describing seasonal adjustment in on the online syllabus. Access it here.

So, while we have to wait until Monday to see how the employment report will affect the stock and bond markets, there was a great deal of discussion about the report overall and its likely asset market effects on television Friday. One question that is emerging about "good news" is whether the stock market will react positively or negatively at the present time. Why? Because "good news" may signal the increased likelihood of Fed tightening. And, we saw earlier in the semester, that rising interest rates are bad for stock prices (often referred to as a "head wind"). But, a stronger economy means profit strength in the future, which is a plus for stock prices. So, which effect will predominate with investors? Stay tuned, we'll see. Here's a Friday article that discusses this. Let's see how accurate it proves to be.

Along with employment, the monthly labor market report also has information on the unemployment rate, which fell unexpectedly from 4.6% to 4.4%, placing us at full employment, an average hourly wage growth. Often this is taken to be an inflation indicator, but it really isn't that good at signaling future inflation (here's an article discussing that). Actual wage growth was 0.3%, the expected amount, so there is not likely to be any reaction to that aspect of the report. As I stated in class, there are composition effects to wage change, determined by the types of jobs that are added in a given month. If lots of "high wage" jobs are added, the wage gain will be substantial. If largely "low wage" jobs are added, the opposite occurs.

So, what is happening to inflation expectations? Has the employment report changed anything? I have shown a way to observe this using StockCharts.com and TIPS prices relative to bond prices. For extra credit, graph this ratio (which we have discussed in class before) using daily data (make it a line graph). Annotate this with comments, print it and add a paragraph of discussion, and hand this in at the beginning of class on Tuesday. I will not accept anything after the beginning of class.

So, Monday morning promises to be very interesting for the stock, bond, and currency markets. It would be very good practice for you to think of what "should" happen, based on economic theory.

Employment Report Effects

The February employment report was released yesterday at 8:30 am. The stakes for the markets were high: too low a number and recession fears would re-emerge, which would hurt the stock market but help the bond market; too high, and the opposite would be a problem, with a reduced likelihood of the Fed easing in the near term.

The payroll employment number that emerged was +97,000, which was high enough to remove recession fears, but not so high that worries of overheating would emerge. This scenario has come to be called the Goldilocks Scenario. Read the following article about all of this. Also, read the chapter on the employment report in the Carnes and Slifer text (The Atlas of Economic Indicators).

The stock market began the day with a healthy rise but gave much of this back by the end of the trading day. This often happens when markets get what they were hoping for (this is a variant of the old saying: Buy on the rumor, sell on the news). So, SUPPORT AND RESISTANCE BOTH HELD.

The principle items that caused a reaction in the bond market were a higher-than-expected rise in average hourly wages and a decline in the unemployment rate to 4.5%. In addition to these, the prior months' employment numbers were adjusted upward (this has been occurring for a while now). So, it is very likely that today's somewhat tepid payroll employment increase will be revised higher with the release of next month's data. All of these factors heightened inflation fears, causing a bond market sell off. The 10-year bond rate rose to just under 4.6%, an increase of 8 basis points for the day. Clearly, the bond market wants the Fed to lower interest rates, and the employment report dashed those hopes (for now at least). I guess the bond market's view of the world should be referred to as "The Three Bears," given the stock market's view.

So the "wildcard" for now is the mortgage market. How far will weakness in the sub-prime market reach higher tiers? It has already impacted the "Alt A" market, and with the tightening of lending standards, it will very likely creep somewhat into the market for prime mortgages. The different perceptions of the future state of the economy held by the stock and bond market centers largely on the answer to this question. For now, at least, it appears safe to say that "all's quiet on the carry trade front." Stay tuned.

An interesting article for you to read is by Jeremy Siegel. He attributes part of the recent volatility in stock markets to "trend following" by technicians. These traders (myself included) often place automated "stop loss" orders below the trend so they can insulate themselves from potentially large losses. Here's how a stop loss order works. You choose a price level at or below which you want to get out of a stock (or index like an ETF). Hopefully your choice is based on where support is. You should place the "stop" a bit below support, so that if a false breakdown occurs you don't get "stopped out," after which the stock begins to rise again. You then place an order stating this with your brokerage account. To automate this, specify the time frame for your order as "Good Till Cancelled," or GTC. Normally, this will remain in effect for several months. If, instead, you specify market day, you are only covered for that trading day, after which the order no longer exists. Specifying GTC thus automates this process so you don't have to remain in front of your computer all the time.

So when trendlines are finally broken in sustained uptrends, many of these stop orders kick in, potentially causing large sell offs, and magnified price declines. Hence the volatility aspects. I doubt that stop loss orders played the major role in the large Tuesday sell off, but they were certainly part of it.

A recommendation when you buy stocks: USE STOP LOSSES, but leave room below support in case a false breakdown occurs. Remember, capital preservation should be a primary factor for you.

Today's Employment Report

This morning, the January employment report was released. The consensus estimate for job change was +150,000, partly related to what was considered to be warmer-than-normal weather nationally in January. When the number was initially released, it appeared that employment change was slower than expected: +111,000. BUT, prior months were revised up significantly higher, RULE: ALWAYS LOOK AT REVISIONS TO PRIOR DATA BEFORE ANALYZING THE MOST RECENT DATA POINT. Here is an article about the report that you should read.

Along with employment change, the government released the January unemployment rate (slight rise to 4.6%), hours worked (slight decline), and the change in average hourly wages (+0.4%).

When the employment report is released, market participants attempt to gauge the implications for growth and inflation. As we will see this week, nominal interest rates are a function of both of these, so interest rate implications are critical when this report is released. And, it took a while for the markets to "digest" all that was going on with this report. The graph below shows this, focusing on the 10-year bond rate. It is from MarketWatch.com and has OHLC bars for 15 minute intervals to show more immediate and ongoing reactions. The double vertical line in the middle of the graph denotes the end of trading on Thursday. To the right is Friday (today) and the reaction to the job report. Can you see the obvious manifestation of initial confusion by the market for the 10-year bond rate.? Actually, the relevant question is how can you miss it?

The inflation implications of the report are derived from the behavior of the unemployment rate (it relates to resource utilization) and the hourly wage change (which could put upward pressure on prices when it rises "a lot"). In general, when the unemployment rate falls, this is taken to signal tighter labor markets and upward pressure on wages and prices in the future. Translation: higher future expected inflation. How inflationary depends on where the rate is and how much it changes. The lower the unemployment rate, the more inflationary will be the impact of declines. Similarly, the more rapid is growth in the average hourly wage, the more inflationary is it taken to be. We will see later in the course that productivity should also be taken into account to make a more proper determination of this (called Unit Labor Cost), but productivity data are only released quarterly.

Follow the 10-year rate for the remainder of the day. What ultimately happened? Compare the daily bar in StockCharts.com to the prior day. Also, look at the 10-year on a weekly chart.

Employment Report Implications

Today, the September employment report was released. There was a weaker-than-expected employment change of 51,000. If the market's focus were solely on this number, interest rates would have fallen (lower inflation expectations due to slower expected growth), and the stock market should have risen as this is consistent with the "soft landing" scenario.

As it turned out, the stock market dropped slightly. But, the biggest story was that the 10-year bond rose by 9 basis points, all the way up to 4.70%! How did that happen?

First, the bond market, which subscribes to the "hard landing" scenario, had not only priced in that the Fed is finished raising interest rates, they apparently also presumed that the Fed would begin easing early in 2007. Wow! While the 51,000 payroll change would normally have made them happy, there was a sizeable upward revision to August's payroll number (+60,000), the unemployment rate dropped to 4.6%, tied for its lowest value in a while, and the government released a statement indicating that payroll employment gains have been understated through March of this year, by about 800,000.

So, taken together, this information says the economy has more strength than the bond market had presumed, and the likelihood of the Fed lowering interest rates early next year is now remote. What is the outcome? You guessed it, a bond sell off, pushing interest rates higher. Go to StockCharts.com and plot the 10-year bond ($TNX) to see that action for yourself. The chart shows the 10-year (click to enlarge).

Note the large bar for today. Using the Raff Regression Tool (sixth icon from the top right), I made the blue price channel and have indicated three resistance levels (think of these as R1, R2, and R3 as technicans would). I have also located support.

The other story is the recent strength in the dollar. I discussed in class today that when we see the combination of rising stock prices, rising bond prices (declining r) and a rising dollar, this indicates that foreign investors are bringing money into US asset markets. This happened earlier in the week. What about today?

With the threat of a nuclear weapons test by North Korea, the dollar strengthened. Once upon a time (translation: when I was a student), gold was the "safe haven" when indicents like this occurred. Today, gold only rose $1.50. The US dollar has now become the safe haven. And when the US dollar strengthens, US asset markets also become relatively more attractive to foreign investors. This bodes well for stock indices not falling too far too fast. When the US dollar strengthens, this also puts downward pressure on commodity prices. Check out the CRB Index ($CRB) to see this.

Finally, to see the international fallout (sorry!) from the possible nuclear weapons test, check out the Japanese Yen index ($XJY). Not a pretty sight!