I have been discussing the decline in very short-term rates, especially those for the 1-month and 3-month t-bills. As of class today, those rates had fallen to 4 bp for the 1-month t-bill and 2pb for the 3-month, indicating an inversion for the 3-month relative to the 1-month rate. I noted that this may well signal the possibly that something will be occurring shortly, perhaps an upcoming equity market correction (although not necessarily a large correction).
Something did occur later today -- short-term t-bill rates went negative! Here is an article from FT discussing this fact. The article attributes the negative interest rates to a very strong demand by banks to have "pristine" assets on their balance sheets at the end of the year. While I have no doubt this is correct, does this explain the whole story? Consider the explanation above to be a hypothesis, not necessarily "the" fact about negative short-term rates.
My question is whether this appetite for short-term treasury debt is the cause or effect of other things occurring in the financial sector? In other words, the effect of shaky financial fundamentals or upcoming risk could be the year-end appetite for short-term treasuries. This is certainly something to think about. While the appetite for quality assets on bank balance sheets at year end certainly could be expected to put downward pressure on these short-term rates, would it be sufficient to move them all the way to negative values? I'm not so sure.
We'll have to wait to see how this plays out. Let me say, though, that I never expected to see negative short-term rates this soon after the economic free-fall of last fall!
POST SCRIPT: As of the next morning (Friday, 11/20), short-term t-bill rates have returned to positive, with the 1-month at 5.5 bp and the 3-month at 1.5 bp. Note the short-term rate inversion has been sustained. I continue to believe that this rate behavior signals underlying problems with the strength of our financial system that has in part, at least, been picked up by the stock market (recent pull backs). Here is another article written about this in Barrons, the more informative of the two to read.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
10-Year Bond Rates
If you look at the 10-year bond rate since the end of 2008, the economic free fall, until the present time, you see several interesting and informative behaviors. First, when the economy was in potentially serious condition in November and December of 2008, rates gapped down on several occasions. This means that bond price gapped up on those occasions. Second, if we apply Fibonacci analysis to the bottom in rates at the end of 2008 up to the present time, you see that Fibonacci has been very predictive for likely declines from the recent 10-year peak of around 4% in June of this year. The chart below shows this (click to enlarge). Remember that the values on the right axis are 10x the interest rate, so 36 is really 3.6.
The 61.8% retracement level (around 3.27%) has been touched on several occasions. Note that the rate has yet to fall to the 50% retracement point (at 3.04%). While we remain slightly above the 61.8 percent mark, note that the RSI is still above the oversold reading of 30, so it is quite possible that we will see another retest of the 61.8 percent level at 3.27%. The likelihood of this rests on, among other things, markets continuing to believe the message delivered by Fed Chair Bernanke the other day.
What we have been witnessing in the short-term, however, is a rising stock market with a strong bond market. So, stock prices have been rising while interest rates have been falling. This is not the typical pattern. Usually stock prices and interest rates move in the same direction. You should think about this to strengthen your understanding of the stock and bond markets. The "other thing" that is not equal is the words of the Fed Chair.
I have recently heard some "talking heads" discuss whether the bond market is a bubble at present, while others are hinting that rates have gotten very high, potentially a cause for worry. I have plotted the 10-year rate weekly over a very long time period. The chart shows this from the early 1990s (click to enlarge). The current 10-year rate is hardly excessive based on its history, which showed it to be around 8 percent in the early 1990s. Note the long-term downward sloping resistance line. Were we to move up to that line, the 10-year rate would have to rise to 4.75 percent, which is approximately the level it attained during the double top in 2006-2007 (note: that double top is what converted me to using technical analysis -- the technical analysis prediction of a declining rate from that double top ran counter to the "traditional economic wisdom" of the day which saw higher rates coming). How likely is it for the 10-year rate to rest resistance at around 4.75 percent? Use the model of interest rates we have developed and enhanced from class:
Remember: in place of economic growth in this model, you should now employ the Basic Keynesian Model which identifies factors that generate growth: changes in autonomous spending (from C, Ip, G, and NX). The resulting forecast will allow you to move well beyond the limits of technical analysis.
The 61.8% retracement level (around 3.27%) has been touched on several occasions. Note that the rate has yet to fall to the 50% retracement point (at 3.04%). While we remain slightly above the 61.8 percent mark, note that the RSI is still above the oversold reading of 30, so it is quite possible that we will see another retest of the 61.8 percent level at 3.27%. The likelihood of this rests on, among other things, markets continuing to believe the message delivered by Fed Chair Bernanke the other day.
I have recently heard some "talking heads" discuss whether the bond market is a bubble at present, while others are hinting that rates have gotten very high, potentially a cause for worry. I have plotted the 10-year rate weekly over a very long time period. The chart shows this from the early 1990s (click to enlarge). The current 10-year rate is hardly excessive based on its history, which showed it to be around 8 percent in the early 1990s. Note the long-term downward sloping resistance line. Were we to move up to that line, the 10-year rate would have to rise to 4.75 percent, which is approximately the level it attained during the double top in 2006-2007 (note: that double top is what converted me to using technical analysis -- the technical analysis prediction of a declining rate from that double top ran counter to the "traditional economic wisdom" of the day which saw higher rates coming). How likely is it for the 10-year rate to rest resistance at around 4.75 percent? Use the model of interest rates we have developed and enhanced from class:r = f(expected inflation, autonomous spending components, monetary policy)
Remember: in place of economic growth in this model, you should now employ the Basic Keynesian Model which identifies factors that generate growth: changes in autonomous spending (from C, Ip, G, and NX). The resulting forecast will allow you to move well beyond the limits of technical analysis.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
How Overextended is Gold?
I have been going over the market for gold ($GOLD) in class since last week. We have looked at daily and weekly data, viewed the RSI, and we have gone back to consider where the US Dollar ($USD) is, as the dollar and commodities are inversely related (other things being equal). What I want to do in this post is to show you another way to show whether something is overbought or oversold.
First, chart $GOLD using daily data. Find a moving average that fits the time period under consideration very well. After a number of different values (starting from 20-day to higher periods), I found that the 150-day simple moving average fits gold very well, as the chart shows (click to enlarge).
To find a way to view how far the closing price is from this moving average, under "Indicators" below the graph, use the following information with StockCharts.com: MACD with values 1,150,1 (select MACD then enter the values I indicated).
That produces the graph below the Gold chart. You can annotate any (or all) of this set of charts. Here, apply a horizontal line to the peaks of the gap measure (the MACD values) to find where resistance has been before. It should be clear from the chart that recently, Gold price moved above its 150-day moving average by the greatest amount since either June of 2008 or September of this year. Note, also, this has occurred as Gold is very overbought based on the RSI (which is also showing a bearish divergence).So, you can see from this chart that there is yet another basis to conclude that some short-term pullback in Gold price is likely. Note, though, that markets can remain overbought for some time, so any pullback might not occur for a while yet.
First, chart $GOLD using daily data. Find a moving average that fits the time period under consideration very well. After a number of different values (starting from 20-day to higher periods), I found that the 150-day simple moving average fits gold very well, as the chart shows (click to enlarge).
To find a way to view how far the closing price is from this moving average, under "Indicators" below the graph, use the following information with StockCharts.com: MACD with values 1,150,1 (select MACD then enter the values I indicated).
That produces the graph below the Gold chart. You can annotate any (or all) of this set of charts. Here, apply a horizontal line to the peaks of the gap measure (the MACD values) to find where resistance has been before. It should be clear from the chart that recently, Gold price moved above its 150-day moving average by the greatest amount since either June of 2008 or September of this year. Note, also, this has occurred as Gold is very overbought based on the RSI (which is also showing a bearish divergence).So, you can see from this chart that there is yet another basis to conclude that some short-term pullback in Gold price is likely. Note, though, that markets can remain overbought for some time, so any pullback might not occur for a while yet.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Friday's Employment Report
I had stated in class that the bond market anticipated a bad employment report. THE BOND MARKET WAS CORRECT. In anticipation of a larger-than-expected fall in employment (an actual fall of 263,000 -- much worse than the "consensus" estimate), and thus slower growth ahead, interest rates had been falling during this week. And, the actual number didn't do anything to reverse that trend. Here is a very short summary of the day's 10-year bond performance.
The chart (click to enlarge) shows the ten-year bond rate ($TNX). NOTE: the rate of interest is the listed value on the right axis divided by 10. So, 35 corresponds to a 3.5% rate, etc. Resistance for the 10-year bond rate has recently been 3.5% -- you can see the rate bouncing off this level several times since August. Focusing only on this past week, we see a noticeable decline in the 10-year rate, in anticipation of a weak employment report.
As interest rates and bond prices are inversely related, note from the RSI indicator above the chart that rates are oversold, so a bond rally (on potentially bad news) has caused bond prices to be overbought.
There is one interesting thing about Friday after the employment release: the 10-year rate rose (and prices fell). And, while the rate hit 3.1% at one point during the day, the close was higher than the open. There was also a lower tail (remember: a possible signal of change of momentum). It is quite possible that the low on Friday may be a 10-year low for the short-term based on Friday's price bar. Keep in mind, though, that mortgage rates tend to be highly correlated with the 10-year bond rate, so it appears that we are going to see lower mortgage rates ahead (below 5% on 30-year mortgages). The real question is whether mortgage applications rise or fall ("other things" are not necessarily equal).
The stock market had a rough couple of days. After class on Thursday, the market dropped sharply. Friday, after the report, another sharp drop occurred until around mid-day when we came off the lows of the day. Here is a story about the stock and bond markets. For extra credit, due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, create a chart of the S&P 500 (daily) using "fill the chart" as the data range. Put the RSI in the same chart (not above or below it), paste this into a Word document. In that document, provide a brief summary indicating how the RSI signaled the recent stock market decline.
You should continue following the bond market throughout the remainder of this semester and beyond, noting what it is forecasting and contrast this with what the stock market is assuming. We will cover the stock market this week.
The chart (click to enlarge) shows the ten-year bond rate ($TNX). NOTE: the rate of interest is the listed value on the right axis divided by 10. So, 35 corresponds to a 3.5% rate, etc. Resistance for the 10-year bond rate has recently been 3.5% -- you can see the rate bouncing off this level several times since August. Focusing only on this past week, we see a noticeable decline in the 10-year rate, in anticipation of a weak employment report.
There is one interesting thing about Friday after the employment release: the 10-year rate rose (and prices fell). And, while the rate hit 3.1% at one point during the day, the close was higher than the open. There was also a lower tail (remember: a possible signal of change of momentum). It is quite possible that the low on Friday may be a 10-year low for the short-term based on Friday's price bar. Keep in mind, though, that mortgage rates tend to be highly correlated with the 10-year bond rate, so it appears that we are going to see lower mortgage rates ahead (below 5% on 30-year mortgages). The real question is whether mortgage applications rise or fall ("other things" are not necessarily equal).
The stock market had a rough couple of days. After class on Thursday, the market dropped sharply. Friday, after the report, another sharp drop occurred until around mid-day when we came off the lows of the day. Here is a story about the stock and bond markets. For extra credit, due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, create a chart of the S&P 500 (daily) using "fill the chart" as the data range. Put the RSI in the same chart (not above or below it), paste this into a Word document. In that document, provide a brief summary indicating how the RSI signaled the recent stock market decline.
You should continue following the bond market throughout the remainder of this semester and beyond, noting what it is forecasting and contrast this with what the stock market is assuming. We will cover the stock market this week.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
New Notes Online
I have two more sets of online notes to complete the Bond Market information now being covered in class. These are listed near the Bond notes on the online syllabus. If you want to download these from this post, here are the links: The Yield Curve, Stock Market, and Interest Rates and The Money Market.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Fed Decision?
As expected, at 2:15 today the Federal Reserve made its decision not to raise rates (thank God!), and released its short statement summarizing its assessment of the economy now and in the future. Here is a copy of the actual Fed statement. And, as I indicated to you in class, the media provided an anal and microscopic evaluation of this statement compared to the previous one (click here).
How did the stock market react? Below is an image of the S&P 500 using 15-minute intervals (click to enlarge). Look this over, as a number of the key elements for reading market momentum show up. First, note when the announcement occurred at 2:15. The initial reaction was very positive (large up bar). But, that wasn't sustainable, as the RSI(9) showed an overbought reading (above 70). The next 15 minutes, we see a classic illustration of what happens when momentum diminishes -- a bar with a significant upper tail. This indicates that the bulls were able to push price fairly high, but the bears ultimately beat them back. For that bar, note the close (of the 15 minutes) was almost identical to the open. In the next bar, the open was above the prior bar's close, but things got bad for the bulls as the bears were clearly in control at this point. Take a look at the last bar of the trading day - a large range, the bears were clearly in control by then, and the close was almost at the low for that 15-minute period.
The day ended with an ugly price bar, but a glimmer of hope for tomorrow -- the RSI was giving an oversold reading (was below 30). If price should continue to fall, how low can we expect it to fall? Let me restate this: where is the next level of support? To find this, use the rule from class: look to the left. In other words, extend the time period of the chart. In the second graph (click to enlarge), I have extended to 5 days. From this, we are able to see the next level of support at around 1058.
Let's see what happens tomorrow.
How did the stock market react? Below is an image of the S&P 500 using 15-minute intervals (click to enlarge). Look this over, as a number of the key elements for reading market momentum show up. First, note when the announcement occurred at 2:15. The initial reaction was very positive (large up bar). But, that wasn't sustainable, as the RSI(9) showed an overbought reading (above 70). The next 15 minutes, we see a classic illustration of what happens when momentum diminishes -- a bar with a significant upper tail. This indicates that the bulls were able to push price fairly high, but the bears ultimately beat them back. For that bar, note the close (of the 15 minutes) was almost identical to the open. In the next bar, the open was above the prior bar's close, but things got bad for the bulls as the bears were clearly in control at this point. Take a look at the last bar of the trading day - a large range, the bears were clearly in control by then, and the close was almost at the low for that 15-minute period.
The day ended with an ugly price bar, but a glimmer of hope for tomorrow -- the RSI was giving an oversold reading (was below 30). If price should continue to fall, how low can we expect it to fall? Let me restate this: where is the next level of support? To find this, use the rule from class: look to the left. In other words, extend the time period of the chart. In the second graph (click to enlarge), I have extended to 5 days. From this, we are able to see the next level of support at around 1058.Let's see what happens tomorrow.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Welcome back!
Welcome to the Fall 2009 semester.
This blog will have postings throughout the semester -- my way of communicating important information to you when we are not meeting as a class. Check in on the days after class meets, especially on weekends. To make this worth your while, there will be two or three extra credit assignments posted on the Blog throughout the semester.
The past year was dominated by a severe financial crisis and a global recession. The recession was so severe (believed to be the worst since the Depression) that it took on a name: "The Great Recession." This semester, growth remains a major concern, as there is considerable debate about whether or not a national economic recovery has actually begun. Whether or not this is so (I believe we are in the earliest stages of a recovery), credit market weakness (ongoing credit problems and further after-effects of sub-prime mortgages) will also be important, as will the behavior of inflation (will it suddenly spark as some observers fear?). In its next move, the Fed will raise the fed funds rate, as it is currently at (or near) 0. The only question that remains is when such a rate hike will occur.
By semester's end, you will come to understand that all of the factors we will be discussing throughout the semester are interrelated. And, as the semester unfolds, we'll see what the collective actions of the world's central banks will be, and if their assessments of what they need to do prove to be correct.
For now, read all of Stikki Stock Charts for next Thursday and visit the web site: Stockcharts.com. On the online syllabus I have added introductory material that will assist you in using that web site (we will be referring to it all semester).
If you have any questions throughout the semester, don't hesitate to e-mail me (llardaro@uri.edu) and/or stop by my office, Chafee 804. DO NOT LEAVE PHONE MESSAGES!!
This blog will have postings throughout the semester -- my way of communicating important information to you when we are not meeting as a class. Check in on the days after class meets, especially on weekends. To make this worth your while, there will be two or three extra credit assignments posted on the Blog throughout the semester.
The past year was dominated by a severe financial crisis and a global recession. The recession was so severe (believed to be the worst since the Depression) that it took on a name: "The Great Recession." This semester, growth remains a major concern, as there is considerable debate about whether or not a national economic recovery has actually begun. Whether or not this is so (I believe we are in the earliest stages of a recovery), credit market weakness (ongoing credit problems and further after-effects of sub-prime mortgages) will also be important, as will the behavior of inflation (will it suddenly spark as some observers fear?). In its next move, the Fed will raise the fed funds rate, as it is currently at (or near) 0. The only question that remains is when such a rate hike will occur.
By semester's end, you will come to understand that all of the factors we will be discussing throughout the semester are interrelated. And, as the semester unfolds, we'll see what the collective actions of the world's central banks will be, and if their assessments of what they need to do prove to be correct.
For now, read all of Stikki Stock Charts for next Thursday and visit the web site: Stockcharts.com. On the online syllabus I have added introductory material that will assist you in using that web site (we will be referring to it all semester).
If you have any questions throughout the semester, don't hesitate to e-mail me (llardaro@uri.edu) and/or stop by my office, Chafee 804. DO NOT LEAVE PHONE MESSAGES!!
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Oil Price
As I stated in class today, oil prices ($WTIC) have recently made, but not completed, a double top. The chart (click to enlarge) shows this, along with how to calculate the target price. First, it is important to point out that for a double top formation to be completed, market price must break below the neckline, which has not yet happened (also, remember this chart is EOD, or End of Day). The calculation of the lower price target is given on the chart. In the pres
ent example, assuming that this pattern is completed, so that price closes below the neckline, the falling price target is just under $40/barrel.
I have drawn a horizontal line at (approximately) that price target. Something interesting emerges: if the target is reached, we can expect a re-test of support that has existed since the beginning of 2009. Notice that there were a few false breakdowns below this support in February, but support there held.
The important question for ECN 335 is the informational content of this formation. In other words, what is this market telling us about the direction of the overall economy, commodity prices, or other factors in the near term?
Start by modeling oil prices (and commodity prices in general): demand for goods (predicated on production), and the strength of the US Dollar are major factors. In addition to these, factors specific to this particular commodity (ex: geopolitical problems concerning oil production) should also be taken into account. Next, view oil price alongside other indicators such as cyclicals ($CYC) and determine whether it is a lagging, coincident, or leading indicator (read Carnes & Slifer's text to help with this).
ent example, assuming that this pattern is completed, so that price closes below the neckline, the falling price target is just under $40/barrel.I have drawn a horizontal line at (approximately) that price target. Something interesting emerges: if the target is reached, we can expect a re-test of support that has existed since the beginning of 2009. Notice that there were a few false breakdowns below this support in February, but support there held.
The important question for ECN 335 is the informational content of this formation. In other words, what is this market telling us about the direction of the overall economy, commodity prices, or other factors in the near term?
Start by modeling oil prices (and commodity prices in general): demand for goods (predicated on production), and the strength of the US Dollar are major factors. In addition to these, factors specific to this particular commodity (ex: geopolitical problems concerning oil production) should also be taken into account. Next, view oil price alongside other indicators such as cyclicals ($CYC) and determine whether it is a lagging, coincident, or leading indicator (read Carnes & Slifer's text to help with this).
Friday, April 17, 2009
Gaps and the NASDAQ
On occasion, gaps appear in price charts. These arise almost exclusively in daily and intra-day charts. There are a number of things that cause gaps to emerge in individual stocks, such as news or earnings announcements (positive or negative) coming out after a day's trading has ended, which causes a new equilibrium price that is different enough to gap up or down from the prior day's trading range. Actually, there are several different types of gaps. There is a good article about them at Chart School in StockCharts.com, and another about how to trade gaps on Investopdia.
The reason for this blog post is that the NASDAQ has seen several gaps over the past few weeks. The chart below (click to enlarge
) shows this. One thing that many of us who follow the market utilize is the tendency for gaps to be filled. How long it takes for this to occur, however, can vary widely, and it depends on the type of gap (see the articles above). Some, breakaway gaps, for example, can take quite a while to fill, if they even end up being filled. At the other extreme is exhaustion gaps, which are very likely to fill (see articles). The gaps in the NASDAQ chart are merely "plain vanilla" or standard gaps. Note an interesting pattern for the last two gaps: they both filled on the third day (almost sounds biblical!). DO NOT make anything of this, it is merely a coincidence.
I do want to point out a trading strategy related to the typical gap. Since gaps tend to eventually fill (again, depending on the type), some traders will essentially place trades that presuppose this. In other words, they trade in the opposite direction of the gap. This is called fading the gap. While I have used this on a number of occasions in the past, I did so with added criteria. So, according to this trading philosophy, if a down gap emerges, go long in anticipation that price will rise and fill the gap.
How likely is it that a gap will be filled in a reasonable time period? Use technical indicators to make this determination. If there is an up gap, for example, and price moves fairly close to resistance and/or the RSI shows an overbought reading, the odds of gap filling are in your favor. It might take longer than you are comfortable with, however. This has a bearing when traders are using options which have a time decay factor that lowers their prices each day as you wait for the filling to occur. Similarly, if a gap down occurs, moving price close to support and/or the RSI is at oversold readings, the likelihood of filling the gap are fairly good. As always, identify either bullish or bearish divergences improves the odds of your being correct even more.
When I originally planned to write this blog, another pattern existed that has now ended. The most likely support for the NASDAQ at present is its 50-day moving average. If a gap emerges that is not very far from the 50-day, and the RSI is at or near an overbought reading, the odds that the gap will be filled as part of a retest of support (at the 50-day moving average) are very favorable.
Let me end this post by transcending exclusive reliance on technical criteria. If you are attempting to determine where price will eventually go, create a price forecast using economic criteria. Identify the primary explanatory variables that will influence price over your time period of interest, then predict what each of them will do. Once you have done this, determine the dominant changes and along with that, your price forecast. For the market as a whole, price depends on interest rates and profit expectations. You then find several variables for each of those factors. At the firm or industry level, the choice of factors can differ. For example, interest rates might not be very influential (ex: consumer staples), or how cyclical the firm or its industry are must be accounted for. That leads to your identifying additional factors to use in your forecast.
Hopefully, it might have crossed your mind that it is also highly useful to incorporate intermarket relationships into this type of analysis. What is the commodity market signaling? How about currencies? The bond market? Put all of this together (as you must for the course paper) and you have a very educated guess about the overall market's direction.
The reason for this blog post is that the NASDAQ has seen several gaps over the past few weeks. The chart below (click to enlarge
) shows this. One thing that many of us who follow the market utilize is the tendency for gaps to be filled. How long it takes for this to occur, however, can vary widely, and it depends on the type of gap (see the articles above). Some, breakaway gaps, for example, can take quite a while to fill, if they even end up being filled. At the other extreme is exhaustion gaps, which are very likely to fill (see articles). The gaps in the NASDAQ chart are merely "plain vanilla" or standard gaps. Note an interesting pattern for the last two gaps: they both filled on the third day (almost sounds biblical!). DO NOT make anything of this, it is merely a coincidence.I do want to point out a trading strategy related to the typical gap. Since gaps tend to eventually fill (again, depending on the type), some traders will essentially place trades that presuppose this. In other words, they trade in the opposite direction of the gap. This is called fading the gap. While I have used this on a number of occasions in the past, I did so with added criteria. So, according to this trading philosophy, if a down gap emerges, go long in anticipation that price will rise and fill the gap.
How likely is it that a gap will be filled in a reasonable time period? Use technical indicators to make this determination. If there is an up gap, for example, and price moves fairly close to resistance and/or the RSI shows an overbought reading, the odds of gap filling are in your favor. It might take longer than you are comfortable with, however. This has a bearing when traders are using options which have a time decay factor that lowers their prices each day as you wait for the filling to occur. Similarly, if a gap down occurs, moving price close to support and/or the RSI is at oversold readings, the likelihood of filling the gap are fairly good. As always, identify either bullish or bearish divergences improves the odds of your being correct even more.
When I originally planned to write this blog, another pattern existed that has now ended. The most likely support for the NASDAQ at present is its 50-day moving average. If a gap emerges that is not very far from the 50-day, and the RSI is at or near an overbought reading, the odds that the gap will be filled as part of a retest of support (at the 50-day moving average) are very favorable.
Let me end this post by transcending exclusive reliance on technical criteria. If you are attempting to determine where price will eventually go, create a price forecast using economic criteria. Identify the primary explanatory variables that will influence price over your time period of interest, then predict what each of them will do. Once you have done this, determine the dominant changes and along with that, your price forecast. For the market as a whole, price depends on interest rates and profit expectations. You then find several variables for each of those factors. At the firm or industry level, the choice of factors can differ. For example, interest rates might not be very influential (ex: consumer staples), or how cyclical the firm or its industry are must be accounted for. That leads to your identifying additional factors to use in your forecast.
Hopefully, it might have crossed your mind that it is also highly useful to incorporate intermarket relationships into this type of analysis. What is the commodity market signaling? How about currencies? The bond market? Put all of this together (as you must for the course paper) and you have a very educated guess about the overall market's direction.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Which Way Will the Market Go?
The recent rally has taken a pause at best, and perhaps the recent rally has run its course. While the market has declined for the past two days, today's decline was much larger than Monday, as the S&P fell by almost 20 points back to 815.6. How can we gauge whether this is the end of a rally or merely a pause in an uptrend?
Technical indicators are helpful for this. The following chart (click to enlarge) is the daily S&P performance over the past s
ix months. There are two conflicting signals in this chart. First, note the performance of the RSI. While the S&P has recently risen sharply, that momentum was not confirmed by the RSI (see the lines in the chart). Recall, this is a bearish divergence. But if we work with moving averages, we get a buy signal. In the chart I have added the 20-day and 50-day moving averages. Notice that in the past few days, the 20-day has crossed above the 50-day moving average. This could potentially be considered a buy signal (recall: this is related to the average-marginal relationship we discussed earlier in the semester).
So, which indicator should we rely on? Since moving averages are lagging indicators and a bearish divergence of the RSI is a leading indicator, I would tend to go with the RSI's "signal." But that is still no guarantee that the rally is over -- it merely indicates a short-term pullback is in store which we are now witnessing.
In a situation such as this, you should look at weekly data for whatever information it contains, since weekly data does not contain as much "noise" as does daily price data. The chart below shows weekly S&P data (click to enlarge).
I have added the 13-week moving average since this corresponds to a quarter. Note how well this fits the price data.
The weekly RSI shows very different momentum information than does the daily chart. Note the weekly RSI is far from overbought, and there is no bearish divergence. Actually, the RSI has failed for some time to move beyond 50, which would have indicated movement to more bull-market-type momentum.
In this situation, I recommend that you view an RSI value of 50 as resistance for the S&P's price movement. So, based on the weekly RSI, this rally failed at (RSI) resistance. I would only place bets on upward continuation when (and if) the RSI is able to sustain a break above 50. Were this to happen, daily data would clearly have to show an end to the recent pullback.
Technical indicators are helpful for this. The following chart (click to enlarge) is the daily S&P performance over the past s
ix months. There are two conflicting signals in this chart. First, note the performance of the RSI. While the S&P has recently risen sharply, that momentum was not confirmed by the RSI (see the lines in the chart). Recall, this is a bearish divergence. But if we work with moving averages, we get a buy signal. In the chart I have added the 20-day and 50-day moving averages. Notice that in the past few days, the 20-day has crossed above the 50-day moving average. This could potentially be considered a buy signal (recall: this is related to the average-marginal relationship we discussed earlier in the semester).So, which indicator should we rely on? Since moving averages are lagging indicators and a bearish divergence of the RSI is a leading indicator, I would tend to go with the RSI's "signal." But that is still no guarantee that the rally is over -- it merely indicates a short-term pullback is in store which we are now witnessing.
In a situation such as this, you should look at weekly data for whatever information it contains, since weekly data does not contain as much "noise" as does daily price data. The chart below shows weekly S&P data (click to enlarge).
I have added the 13-week moving average since this corresponds to a quarter. Note how well this fits the price data.The weekly RSI shows very different momentum information than does the daily chart. Note the weekly RSI is far from overbought, and there is no bearish divergence. Actually, the RSI has failed for some time to move beyond 50, which would have indicated movement to more bull-market-type momentum.
In this situation, I recommend that you view an RSI value of 50 as resistance for the S&P's price movement. So, based on the weekly RSI, this rally failed at (RSI) resistance. I would only place bets on upward continuation when (and if) the RSI is able to sustain a break above 50. Were this to happen, daily data would clearly have to show an end to the recent pullback.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)