As you probably know, there are different sized firms (small, medium, and large capitalization), and there are different emphases among them in ETF's. In this post I focus on growth and value orientations.
To get the symbols for these, I went to the ishares.com web site, which has an easy navigation method. On the left, select the US Market Cap/Style tab. Sub-tabs appear giving the different market cap possibilities, and when you click on one of these, you get the symbols for the market cap and emphasis of that ETF.
You can use these symbols to determine the size/orientations that are outperforming (hopefully) the market using PerfCharts in StockCharts.com. I have done this for you. Click on the following link to get the PerfChart for this.
You will need to convert this to a bar chart, so click on the bar designation below the graph on the bottom left.
- To compare performance to the S&P click on the S&P tab above the bar chart.
- On the bottom right below the graph, drag the bar to select the time period you will investigate. NOTE that the dates you end up with are given in the top left of the graph.
Once this is done, you will be able to see which sizes are performing best, or which orientation is doing better than others. I used the most recent low for the S&P 500 which occurred on February 5. Using this as the starting date (through the most recent date), small cap growth is the most rapidly growing ETF.
As an investor, how can you use this procedure for selecting potential ETF's or stocks to invest in? Obviously, any ETF's that outperform the S&P are obvious choices for you to consider. BUT, make sure you check the technicals of each of these ETF's before you decide whether to purchase shares (using the regular SharpCharts in StockCharts.com).
If you want to purchase individual stocks, what can you do? The answer to this is simpler than it might appear: Get the symbol of the ETF that is outperforming (here JKK), return to ishares.com, and investigate it there. Enter the symbol on the ishares home page or go to the tab to get to that ETF's page. There you will find the primary holdings in that ETF. You can click to find all holdings if desired), and its sector breakdown. If you click on View All Holdings in ishares.com, symbols for each holding are given. Get the symbols for the 10 largest holdings (PerfCharts can only deal with 10 things at a time). Return to PerfCharts, enter those symbols, then determine which individual stocks have outperformed the other ETF holdings.
Once you identify those, the final step consists of charting these and performing a technical analysis of each (or CandleGlance for the entire group). Based on your results, decide which if any you want to purchase (you should also have a sense of where the overall market is going).
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
February's Employment Report
February's employment report was better than expected. Even though there was a loss of 36,000 jobs, weather factors had been fully expected to exacerbate the final number. More importantly, when weather-distorted values of employment such as February occur, the jobs number in the following month almost always shows a significant rise, as some of the weather-related loss is "made up." This is clearly the expectation going forward, that March will show a rise in employment (not just because of the addition of Census workers). The unemployment rate remained at 9.7 percent, also better than anticipated, leading some to conjecture that we have already. Gseen the peak unemployment rate (I am not convinced of this yet). Here is an article about the report, and two videos from CNBC about the employment report. The first is pre-report, the second occurred after the data were released. The bond market hated the employment news, selling off, as the 10-year bond rose 8 basis points (remember: when bond prices fall, interest rates rise).
Most of the time, when an employment number is released, the stock market tends to bounce around, as bulls and bears battle throughout the day. Generally, this leads to a small daily change for the market that day. This was not the case on Friday, as the market shot higher and sustained its momentum throughout the trading day. The result was a large candle, a large real body, and almost no shadow (tails). Here is the chart for Friday (click to enlarge). Note that resistance in terms of the RSI(9) remains above 60, but it is now slightly overbought. So, will we make it to the next resistance at 1150 without a short-term pullback? Check next week's economic releases and see if there are any major releases that can materially affect the stock market.
I believe that the stock market sustained its earlier momentum as the day wore on because in addition to the jobs report, there was a report that consumer credit had risen, painting a potential picture of how a recovery will gain traction. Of course, time will tell if that perception turns out to be correct, but I believe the market is pricing this in.
There was a good video on CNBC that discusses sectors (a bit) and the interest rate to look at (2-year US Treasury) as a signal that the market will break out from its recent sideways action.
Finally, I didn't mention it in class Thursday, since I want to see who reads the blog postings, but our exam will be on Tuesday, March 16. So, dig in, do the assignment, and study for the upcoming exam.
Most of the time, when an employment number is released, the stock market tends to bounce around, as bulls and bears battle throughout the day. Generally, this leads to a small daily change for the market that day. This was not the case on Friday, as the market shot higher and sustained its momentum throughout the trading day. The result was a large candle, a large real body, and almost no shadow (tails). Here is the chart for Friday (click to enlarge). Note that resistance in terms of the RSI(9) remains above 60, but it is now slightly overbought. So, will we make it to the next resistance at 1150 without a short-term pullback? Check next week's economic releases and see if there are any major releases that can materially affect the stock market.
I believe that the stock market sustained its earlier momentum as the day wore on because in addition to the jobs report, there was a report that consumer credit had risen, painting a potential picture of how a recovery will gain traction. Of course, time will tell if that perception turns out to be correct, but I believe the market is pricing this in.
There was a good video on CNBC that discusses sectors (a bit) and the interest rate to look at (2-year US Treasury) as a signal that the market will break out from its recent sideways action.
Finally, I didn't mention it in class Thursday, since I want to see who reads the blog postings, but our exam will be on Tuesday, March 16. So, dig in, do the assignment, and study for the upcoming exam.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Three Different Resistance Measures
The S&P 500 has stalled around its 50-day moving average, as was true the other day (see the previous post). Now that a few more days have passed since then, we saw a couple of spinning tops, which indicate indecision, then a large down day (yesterday) followed by a significant up day (today). Today's bullish candlestick was not as large as yesterday's bearish candle, and today the market opened from a higher level than yesterday's close. In OHLC charting, this is referred to as an inside day. Overall, I think it is safe to say that there is no definitive direction for future price change at this time. As I stated in class, at times like this, it is advisable to consult the economic calendar for the remainder of this week and next week, identify the "biggie" releases that will occur, then attempt to determine what each of these will do and how the market will react. Nobody can know this with certainty, so don't be intimidated. Actually, if you listen to the "talking heads" on the financial stations and keep track of what they predict, you'll probably be surprised by how inaccurate these persons are. So, don't be afraid to venture out and try this, you probably won't do any worse than the "talking heads."
Look at the following charts and analyze the most recent candlesticks and think about what they indicate about the battle between bulls and bears. Using these, I will now present three different ways to measure resistance.
#1: Fibonacci Retracement: If we apply a Fibonacci Retracement to the most recent high and low of the daily S&P 500 (see chart, click to enlarge), we see something quite interesting: the recent rally stalled at the 61.8% retracement point. The use of Fibonacci Retracement suggests that after a decline, the first possible point of resistance in a rally is when 38.2% of that rally has been erased (retraced). The next possible resistance point is at 50%, while the last occurs at 61.8% retracement.
#2: 50-day Moving Average: The next charts (click to enlarge) shows that the 50-day moving average acted as support for the S&P 500 since last fall, then became resistance in late January of this year. It is fairly common for prior support to become resistance (and vice versa). Note how the most recent rally failed just at the 50-day moving average. At this point, based on the most recent candlesticks, the direction of future price is still a toss up. A definitive move above the 50-day moving average, especially for a major market index, would be very bullish, and we might have a shot at returning to the previous high. If that were to occur, then the market falls below that level, what technical formation do we have? A double top, which is a reversal pattern. More about establishing a down target later this semester if this possibility occurs.
#3: RSI(9) < 60. In this same chart, look at the RSI in the upper portion. Note how the most recent high coincided with the RSI falling below 60 and remaining there. Just as the S&P is now testing its 50-day moving average, so too is it testing the RSI at 60.Often, an RSI value of 60 is used as resistance for a downtrend, while 40 is used to designate support for an uptrend.
So, what will happen from here? As I stated above, look at the economic calendar, identify the "biggie" numbers that can potentially move the market, and attempt to predict what each of these will do. In doing this, you are actually using economic theory, which states (for our purposes at this point):
Stock Prices = f(interest rates, expected future profit)
In analyzing the future releases, focus primarily on the macroeconomic implications for profit expectations, since Fed Chair Bernanke indicated again today that the fed funds rate will remain low "for the foreseeable future." That reassurance was a fundamental driver of today's rally which erased most of yesterday's losses.
Look at the following charts and analyze the most recent candlesticks and think about what they indicate about the battle between bulls and bears. Using these, I will now present three different ways to measure resistance.
#1: Fibonacci Retracement: If we apply a Fibonacci Retracement to the most recent high and low of the daily S&P 500 (see chart, click to enlarge), we see something quite interesting: the recent rally stalled at the 61.8% retracement point. The use of Fibonacci Retracement suggests that after a decline, the first possible point of resistance in a rally is when 38.2% of that rally has been erased (retraced). The next possible resistance point is at 50%, while the last occurs at 61.8% retracement. #2: 50-day Moving Average: The next charts (click to enlarge) shows that the 50-day moving average acted as support for the S&P 500 since last fall, then became resistance in late January of this year. It is fairly common for prior support to become resistance (and vice versa). Note how the most recent rally failed just at the 50-day moving average. At this point, based on the most recent candlesticks, the direction of future price is still a toss up. A definitive move above the 50-day moving average, especially for a major market index, would be very bullish, and we might have a shot at returning to the previous high. If that were to occur, then the market falls below that level, what technical formation do we have? A double top, which is a reversal pattern. More about establishing a down target later this semester if this possibility occurs.
So, what will happen from here? As I stated above, look at the economic calendar, identify the "biggie" numbers that can potentially move the market, and attempt to predict what each of these will do. In doing this, you are actually using economic theory, which states (for our purposes at this point):
Stock Prices = f(interest rates, expected future profit)
In analyzing the future releases, focus primarily on the macroeconomic implications for profit expectations, since Fed Chair Bernanke indicated again today that the fed funds rate will remain low "for the foreseeable future." That reassurance was a fundamental driver of today's rally which erased most of yesterday's losses.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Surprise Discount Rate Announcment
Yesterday, after the markets closed, the Fed announced that it was raising the discount rate by 25 bp. Here is a story about this. The initial reaction after hours was as expected -- the announcement took everyone by surprise. Before this morning's market open, futures pointed to a down day, although the amount kept shrinking. What all of this points to is uncertainty and indecision as market participants digested all of this and formulated their views of the likely consequences.
Which types of candlestick bars depict this? Forget a candle with a long real body and little in terms of shadows (i.e., tails). Look over the candlesticks I covered the other day in class. One would expect either a doji or a spinning top. What actually occurred for the S&P 500 was a spinning top. Here is a chart of the current data (click to enlarge) as of the Friday close.
The RSI is not yet overbought, so potentially there is room for further upward price movement. Note that the RSI is approximately 60, which is the value that some use to indicate resistance for a time of weak price movement. The most striking thing in this chart is the fact that the $SPX closed above its 50-day MA for the first time since January of this year. If the market were worried about the impact of the Fed raising the discount rate, would the S&P have closed above its 50-day MA today? No, it would not have. So, today's price action, in spite of signaling indecision in terms of a spinning top, does allow for the possibility that it the S&P will remain above its 50-day MA at least for the very near term. The real question is whether former resistance, in terms of the 50-day MA, will now become support.
How can we arrive at a way to answer this question? Using economic theory, we model stock prices. According to economic theory:
Stock Price = f(interest rates, expected profits)
Interest rates pertain to asset substitution possibilities in the short-term (review the stock and bond info in the Supply and Demand notes) and product demand in the medium term. Were yesterday's surprise discount rate announcement taken to indicate that Fed tightening was about to begin, not only would the market have failed to clear the 50-day MA today, there would likely have been a noticeable upper shadow (tail) as well. Also, there was a CPI data report today that signaled benign inflation, which signals that interest rates should not rise much. So, the primary factor to focus on is profit expectations. For extra credit, due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, plot the relative strength of the S&P 500 (a measure of stocks) compared to TLT, a measure of longer-term bond prices using as a chart type a solid line with weekly data. In a short word document, include the chart with annotations from StockCharts.com (not hand written) and a very short discussion of what the relative strength of stocks vs bonds is showing us about expectations for future economic activity (and therefore profits). Feel free to consult John Murphy's text about this.
When you get a chance, you should read two excellent columns on technical analysis by Michael Kahn in Barron's Online. I strongly suggest that you save these and others throughout this semester (and beyond). The first of these, written in early February, talks about the market correction. Follow his reading of candlestick charts and overall analysis. The second, from this past week, analyzes the question of whether the market will be fighting back and trend up.
Which types of candlestick bars depict this? Forget a candle with a long real body and little in terms of shadows (i.e., tails). Look over the candlesticks I covered the other day in class. One would expect either a doji or a spinning top. What actually occurred for the S&P 500 was a spinning top. Here is a chart of the current data (click to enlarge) as of the Friday close.
The RSI is not yet overbought, so potentially there is room for further upward price movement. Note that the RSI is approximately 60, which is the value that some use to indicate resistance for a time of weak price movement. The most striking thing in this chart is the fact that the $SPX closed above its 50-day MA for the first time since January of this year. If the market were worried about the impact of the Fed raising the discount rate, would the S&P have closed above its 50-day MA today? No, it would not have. So, today's price action, in spite of signaling indecision in terms of a spinning top, does allow for the possibility that it the S&P will remain above its 50-day MA at least for the very near term. The real question is whether former resistance, in terms of the 50-day MA, will now become support.How can we arrive at a way to answer this question? Using economic theory, we model stock prices. According to economic theory:
Stock Price = f(interest rates, expected profits)
Interest rates pertain to asset substitution possibilities in the short-term (review the stock and bond info in the Supply and Demand notes) and product demand in the medium term. Were yesterday's surprise discount rate announcement taken to indicate that Fed tightening was about to begin, not only would the market have failed to clear the 50-day MA today, there would likely have been a noticeable upper shadow (tail) as well. Also, there was a CPI data report today that signaled benign inflation, which signals that interest rates should not rise much. So, the primary factor to focus on is profit expectations. For extra credit, due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, plot the relative strength of the S&P 500 (a measure of stocks) compared to TLT, a measure of longer-term bond prices using as a chart type a solid line with weekly data. In a short word document, include the chart with annotations from StockCharts.com (not hand written) and a very short discussion of what the relative strength of stocks vs bonds is showing us about expectations for future economic activity (and therefore profits). Feel free to consult John Murphy's text about this.
When you get a chance, you should read two excellent columns on technical analysis by Michael Kahn in Barron's Online. I strongly suggest that you save these and others throughout this semester (and beyond). The first of these, written in early February, talks about the market correction. Follow his reading of candlestick charts and overall analysis. The second, from this past week, analyzes the question of whether the market will be fighting back and trend up.
Monday, February 8, 2010
January Employment Report
Friday's employment report was multifaceted, to say the least. First, there were the employment change results: -20,000 (a very small amount for the entire country, and not statistically significant). Then there were the employment revisions for 2009 -- very large, making the job loss during "The Great Recession" equal to 8.4 million. Finally, there was the unemployment rate, which fell from 10 percent to 9.7 percent. Recommendation: ALWAYS LOOK AT REVISIONS TO PRIOR PERIOD(S) BEFORE EXAMINING THE NEW DATA (as this establishes a proper context for you).
Much was written about these results. Here's what the WSJ said. Here is the link for a video from CNBC after the results were announced, and another link for the same group discussing things before the release. After reviewing all of these,make sure you understand: (1) that there are two separate surveys used for these results; (2) how can the unemployment rate actually fall if employment falls; and (3) what are the implications of the set of results for the stock market, bond market (interest rates), and the US dollar. As I have said numerous times already this semester, "other things" are seldom "equal." So, as a backdrop to all of this information from Europe, is the ongoing concern about the Sovereign debt of Spain, Ireland, and Portugal (these countries have now come to be referred to as the "PIG" countries). So, the final outcome of the day was the joint effect of the Sovereign debt problems and the US employment/unemployment rate data.
Much was written about these results. Here's what the WSJ said. Here is the link for a video from CNBC after the results were announced, and another link for the same group discussing things before the release. After reviewing all of these,make sure you understand: (1) that there are two separate surveys used for these results; (2) how can the unemployment rate actually fall if employment falls; and (3) what are the implications of the set of results for the stock market, bond market (interest rates), and the US dollar. As I have said numerous times already this semester, "other things" are seldom "equal." So, as a backdrop to all of this information from Europe, is the ongoing concern about the Sovereign debt of Spain, Ireland, and Portugal (these countries have now come to be referred to as the "PIG" countries). So, the final outcome of the day was the joint effect of the Sovereign debt problems and the US employment/unemployment rate data.
Monday, February 1, 2010
GDP Surprise
Friday's GDP report, the preliminary look at Q4 economic performance, was surprising. The consensus was for about a 4 percent gain, but the number came in at 5.7 percent. This was an excellent example of how "good news" impacts interest rates: good news tends to cause higher interest rates, as we discussed in class the other day. Here is the link for an article discussing this.
Initially the stock market and interest rates rose as the results were released. By the end of the day, however, things had changed. The chart (click to enlarge), which uses 60-minute OHLC bars, shows how the ten-year US Government bond reacted throughout Friday's trading. First thing to note, the actual interest rate is 1/10 of the value listed on the right scale. So, for example, 36 corresponds to 3.6, etc. Second, note how closing values exceeded opening values for the first two bars (hours). How could we figure that momentum might begin to shift? Look for upper tails, where the bulls were unable to support high levels, and by the end of the time period, bears had pushed values lower. After the second bar (hour), things turned around for the rest of the day, as close was below open each hour. By the last hour, there was essentially a "toss up," as open and close were almost identical.
Why did rates reverse on the "good news." Much of the overall GDP growth was the result of inventory effects (3.7% of the 5.7%), which will not persist in coming quarters.So, while this GDP number was a surprise and good news, interest rates, like asset markets in general, are forward looking. So the news in coming quarters might not necessarily be all that much better than what the markets had been anticipating prior to the GDP release. More data, primarily for this actual quarter, will be needed to move the direction of interest rates from where they were that day. Support, though, appears to be at 3.6 percent. Will this level hold? As the course progresses , I will show you how to use economic models to make an educated guess at questions like this.
Initially the stock market and interest rates rose as the results were released. By the end of the day, however, things had changed. The chart (click to enlarge), which uses 60-minute OHLC bars, shows how the ten-year US Government bond reacted throughout Friday's trading. First thing to note, the actual interest rate is 1/10 of the value listed on the right scale. So, for example, 36 corresponds to 3.6, etc. Second, note how closing values exceeded opening values for the first two bars (hours). How could we figure that momentum might begin to shift? Look for upper tails, where the bulls were unable to support high levels, and by the end of the time period, bears had pushed values lower. After the second bar (hour), things turned around for the rest of the day, as close was below open each hour. By the last hour, there was essentially a "toss up," as open and close were almost identical.
Why did rates reverse on the "good news." Much of the overall GDP growth was the result of inventory effects (3.7% of the 5.7%), which will not persist in coming quarters.So, while this GDP number was a surprise and good news, interest rates, like asset markets in general, are forward looking. So the news in coming quarters might not necessarily be all that much better than what the markets had been anticipating prior to the GDP release. More data, primarily for this actual quarter, will be needed to move the direction of interest rates from where they were that day. Support, though, appears to be at 3.6 percent. Will this level hold? As the course progresses , I will show you how to use economic models to make an educated guess at questions like this.
Monday, December 7, 2009
PAPER CITATIONS
The forecast paper for ECN 327 that is due this Thursday MUST include correctly formatted footnotes and bibliographies. You should get into the habit of doing this for every paper you write. In order to make this process a bit less daunting for you, I have located an easy-to-use link that illustrates the appropriate footnote and corresponding bibliographic entries for various types of sources you might reference. I have chosen the Chicago style for this.
Finally, all of you need to avoid using incorrect words that unfortunately have the effect of making your writing and/or you appear to be "dumb" to persons who don't know you. I am referring to the confusion between "effect" and "affect," and "to" versus "too." I have a handout for you detailing this. If you confuse these words in your papers, you will be penalized a +/- on your paper grade.
Finally, all of you need to avoid using incorrect words that unfortunately have the effect of making your writing and/or you appear to be "dumb" to persons who don't know you. I am referring to the confusion between "effect" and "affect," and "to" versus "too." I have a handout for you detailing this. If you confuse these words in your papers, you will be penalized a +/- on your paper grade.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
November Employment Report
The November employment brought with it several surprises. First, and foremost, payroll employment fell by far less than just about anyone (including me) had predicted. While the consensus number was a decline of around 120,000, the actual number was a decline of just 11,000. In addition to this, decreases from the prior two months were revised to show less job loss. So, with the addition of Census workers early next year, it is very likely that we will see the employment change go positive -- either next month when the November data are revised or when we get January or February data. Second, there was a nostalgic element to Friday's action in that the stock market actually rose along with the US dollar. When was the last time that happened? You should read about the employment report from MarketWatch.com and the Wall Street Journal.
The stock market liked the employment report very much. The Dow-Jones Average started out showing a gain of around 150, but as is so typical of employment release days, gave most of that back (this apparently works in both directions). At the end of the day, the Dow was up 23 points (for 0.2%). Interestingly, the NASDAQ was up by a greater percentage than the Dow, as its 21 point gain was almost 1 percent. Typically, when observing markets it is a good sign when the NASDAQ outperforms the Dow-Jones average. As this stock market "rally" was occurring, the bond market obviously hated what it saw, so a selloff resulted. As bond prices fell, the 10-year bond rate rose by a full 10 bp, a rather significant change. The US Dollar index rose by just over one point (1.07) to close at 75.8. So, enjoy this combination while you can -- a bullish report triggered stock market gains, a bond market sell off, a stronger US Dollar, and a drop in Gold price. That is the way things normally go, but haven't gone this semester as the result of the dollar carry trade.
Along with this favorable economic report, of course, comes all the myopic garbage that has come to characterize coverage by the financial media. Will the Fed now begin to raise rates very soon based on the new-found economic strength? Give me a break! Is the carry trade dead, based on Friday? Gee, we have one full day of that result, so it must be inevitable! I'll probably reserve judgment, though, until I hear from Jon and Kate, and check in with Tiger Woods. Here is the URL for an article with an intelligent discussion of the likelihood of Fed actions based on Friday's report.
The interesting question is how long the pattern of the inverse relationship between the dollar and US stock market has existed. It must seem to all of you that this has been around for a very long time, that this is the "norm." For extra credit due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, produce a chart using weekly data going back three years with the Dow-Jones average and the US Dollar index in the same chart, both as solid lines. Adding annotations, eliminating other elements of the graph like MA's, pinpoint when the current pattern began based on this chart.
So the question now becomes whether the dollar carry trade is dead or possibly dormant for a while. If this is conjecture turns out to be true, the US Dollar should begin to rally without threatening the positive momentum of the US stock market. We can use technical analysis along with economic theory to ascertain whether any short-term bottoming of the dollar is in the cards. Based on the RSI(9) from weekly data, there was a bullish divergence for $USD -- the RSI had been rising while the weekly $USD was recently falling. So, in the very short-term at least, some dollar strength is likely, especially since the RSI is nowhere near an overbought level. In fact, the weekly RSI(9) is at 40.5, which if you look back several months to April, is a resistance level for the RSI. If that resistance is broken, the dollar index could go to either 77 (its next resistance point determined the usual way) or all the way to 80 based on a Fibbonnacci Retracement from March of 2009 until the most recent low. Stay tuned!
The stock market liked the employment report very much. The Dow-Jones Average started out showing a gain of around 150, but as is so typical of employment release days, gave most of that back (this apparently works in both directions). At the end of the day, the Dow was up 23 points (for 0.2%). Interestingly, the NASDAQ was up by a greater percentage than the Dow, as its 21 point gain was almost 1 percent. Typically, when observing markets it is a good sign when the NASDAQ outperforms the Dow-Jones average. As this stock market "rally" was occurring, the bond market obviously hated what it saw, so a selloff resulted. As bond prices fell, the 10-year bond rate rose by a full 10 bp, a rather significant change. The US Dollar index rose by just over one point (1.07) to close at 75.8. So, enjoy this combination while you can -- a bullish report triggered stock market gains, a bond market sell off, a stronger US Dollar, and a drop in Gold price. That is the way things normally go, but haven't gone this semester as the result of the dollar carry trade.
Along with this favorable economic report, of course, comes all the myopic garbage that has come to characterize coverage by the financial media. Will the Fed now begin to raise rates very soon based on the new-found economic strength? Give me a break! Is the carry trade dead, based on Friday? Gee, we have one full day of that result, so it must be inevitable! I'll probably reserve judgment, though, until I hear from Jon and Kate, and check in with Tiger Woods. Here is the URL for an article with an intelligent discussion of the likelihood of Fed actions based on Friday's report.
The interesting question is how long the pattern of the inverse relationship between the dollar and US stock market has existed. It must seem to all of you that this has been around for a very long time, that this is the "norm." For extra credit due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, produce a chart using weekly data going back three years with the Dow-Jones average and the US Dollar index in the same chart, both as solid lines. Adding annotations, eliminating other elements of the graph like MA's, pinpoint when the current pattern began based on this chart.
So the question now becomes whether the dollar carry trade is dead or possibly dormant for a while. If this is conjecture turns out to be true, the US Dollar should begin to rally without threatening the positive momentum of the US stock market. We can use technical analysis along with economic theory to ascertain whether any short-term bottoming of the dollar is in the cards. Based on the RSI(9) from weekly data, there was a bullish divergence for $USD -- the RSI had been rising while the weekly $USD was recently falling. So, in the very short-term at least, some dollar strength is likely, especially since the RSI is nowhere near an overbought level. In fact, the weekly RSI(9) is at 40.5, which if you look back several months to April, is a resistance level for the RSI. If that resistance is broken, the dollar index could go to either 77 (its next resistance point determined the usual way) or all the way to 80 based on a Fibbonnacci Retracement from March of 2009 until the most recent low. Stay tuned!
Friday, November 20, 2009
Short Term Rates Turn Negative -- Again
I have been discussing the decline in very short-term rates, especially those for the 1-month and 3-month t-bills. As of class today, those rates had fallen to 4 bp for the 1-month t-bill and 2pb for the 3-month, indicating an inversion for the 3-month relative to the 1-month rate. I noted that this may well signal the possibly that something will be occurring shortly, perhaps an upcoming equity market correction (although not necessarily a large correction).
Something did occur later today -- short-term t-bill rates went negative! Here is an article from FT discussing this fact. The article attributes the negative interest rates to a very strong demand by banks to have "pristine" assets on their balance sheets at the end of the year. While I have no doubt this is correct, does this explain the whole story? Consider the explanation above to be a hypothesis, not necessarily "the" fact about negative short-term rates.
My question is whether this appetite for short-term treasury debt is the cause or effect of other things occurring in the financial sector? In other words, the effect of shaky financial fundamentals or upcoming risk could be the year-end appetite for short-term treasuries. This is certainly something to think about. While the appetite for quality assets on bank balance sheets at year end certainly could be expected to put downward pressure on these short-term rates, would it be sufficient to move them all the way to negative values? I'm not so sure.
We'll have to wait to see how this plays out. Let me say, though, that I never expected to see negative short-term rates this soon after the economic free-fall of last fall!
POST SCRIPT: As of the next morning (Friday, 11/20), short-term t-bill rates have returned to positive, with the 1-month at 5.5 bp and the 3-month at 1.5 bp. Note the short-term rate inversion has been sustained. I continue to believe that this rate behavior signals underlying problems with the strength of our financial system that has in part, at least, been picked up by the stock market (recent pull backs). Here is another article written about this in Barrons, the more informative of the two to read.
Something did occur later today -- short-term t-bill rates went negative! Here is an article from FT discussing this fact. The article attributes the negative interest rates to a very strong demand by banks to have "pristine" assets on their balance sheets at the end of the year. While I have no doubt this is correct, does this explain the whole story? Consider the explanation above to be a hypothesis, not necessarily "the" fact about negative short-term rates.
My question is whether this appetite for short-term treasury debt is the cause or effect of other things occurring in the financial sector? In other words, the effect of shaky financial fundamentals or upcoming risk could be the year-end appetite for short-term treasuries. This is certainly something to think about. While the appetite for quality assets on bank balance sheets at year end certainly could be expected to put downward pressure on these short-term rates, would it be sufficient to move them all the way to negative values? I'm not so sure.
We'll have to wait to see how this plays out. Let me say, though, that I never expected to see negative short-term rates this soon after the economic free-fall of last fall!
POST SCRIPT: As of the next morning (Friday, 11/20), short-term t-bill rates have returned to positive, with the 1-month at 5.5 bp and the 3-month at 1.5 bp. Note the short-term rate inversion has been sustained. I continue to believe that this rate behavior signals underlying problems with the strength of our financial system that has in part, at least, been picked up by the stock market (recent pull backs). Here is another article written about this in Barrons, the more informative of the two to read.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
10-Year Bond Rates
If you look at the 10-year bond rate since the end of 2008, the economic free fall, until the present time, you see several interesting and informative behaviors. First, when the economy was in potentially serious condition in November and December of 2008, rates gapped down on several occasions. This means that bond price gapped up on those occasions. Second, if we apply Fibonacci analysis to the bottom in rates at the end of 2008 up to the present time, you see that Fibonacci has been very predictive for likely declines from the recent 10-year peak of around 4% in June of this year. The chart below shows this (click to enlarge). Remember that the values on the right axis are 10x the interest rate, so 36 is really 3.6.
The 61.8% retracement level (around 3.27%) has been touched on several occasions. Note that the rate has yet to fall to the 50% retracement point (at 3.04%). While we remain slightly above the 61.8 percent mark, note that the RSI is still above the oversold reading of 30, so it is quite possible that we will see another retest of the 61.8 percent level at 3.27%. The likelihood of this rests on, among other things, markets continuing to believe the message delivered by Fed Chair Bernanke the other day.
What we have been witnessing in the short-term, however, is a rising stock market with a strong bond market. So, stock prices have been rising while interest rates have been falling. This is not the typical pattern. Usually stock prices and interest rates move in the same direction. You should think about this to strengthen your understanding of the stock and bond markets. The "other thing" that is not equal is the words of the Fed Chair.
I have recently heard some "talking heads" discuss whether the bond market is a bubble at present, while others are hinting that rates have gotten very high, potentially a cause for worry. I have plotted the 10-year rate weekly over a very long time period. The chart shows this from the early 1990s (click to enlarge). The current 10-year rate is hardly excessive based on its history, which showed it to be around 8 percent in the early 1990s. Note the long-term downward sloping resistance line. Were we to move up to that line, the 10-year rate would have to rise to 4.75 percent, which is approximately the level it attained during the double top in 2006-2007 (note: that double top is what converted me to using technical analysis -- the technical analysis prediction of a declining rate from that double top ran counter to the "traditional economic wisdom" of the day which saw higher rates coming). How likely is it for the 10-year rate to rest resistance at around 4.75 percent? Use the model of interest rates we have developed and enhanced from class:
Remember: in place of economic growth in this model, you should now employ the Basic Keynesian Model which identifies factors that generate growth: changes in autonomous spending (from C, Ip, G, and NX). The resulting forecast will allow you to move well beyond the limits of technical analysis.
The 61.8% retracement level (around 3.27%) has been touched on several occasions. Note that the rate has yet to fall to the 50% retracement point (at 3.04%). While we remain slightly above the 61.8 percent mark, note that the RSI is still above the oversold reading of 30, so it is quite possible that we will see another retest of the 61.8 percent level at 3.27%. The likelihood of this rests on, among other things, markets continuing to believe the message delivered by Fed Chair Bernanke the other day.
I have recently heard some "talking heads" discuss whether the bond market is a bubble at present, while others are hinting that rates have gotten very high, potentially a cause for worry. I have plotted the 10-year rate weekly over a very long time period. The chart shows this from the early 1990s (click to enlarge). The current 10-year rate is hardly excessive based on its history, which showed it to be around 8 percent in the early 1990s. Note the long-term downward sloping resistance line. Were we to move up to that line, the 10-year rate would have to rise to 4.75 percent, which is approximately the level it attained during the double top in 2006-2007 (note: that double top is what converted me to using technical analysis -- the technical analysis prediction of a declining rate from that double top ran counter to the "traditional economic wisdom" of the day which saw higher rates coming). How likely is it for the 10-year rate to rest resistance at around 4.75 percent? Use the model of interest rates we have developed and enhanced from class:r = f(expected inflation, autonomous spending components, monetary policy)
Remember: in place of economic growth in this model, you should now employ the Basic Keynesian Model which identifies factors that generate growth: changes in autonomous spending (from C, Ip, G, and NX). The resulting forecast will allow you to move well beyond the limits of technical analysis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)